Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Highest fatigue strength options for hand tool with significant stress concentration. 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

Nereth1

Mechanical
Feb 2, 2014
136
Hi all,

Our production engineering has designed a hand tool that significantly improves a process speed, but by its design, it has an 0.8mm thick x 5mm long cantilevered section with a stress raiser on one side, placed under unidrectional bending. Sketch attached.

The stress raiser is on the compressive side, so I'm not sure if it's actually an issue. Arguably it is drawing stress away from the tensile side I suppose, and we should consider making it even worse.

In any case, we can't find a material suitable to make this work for more than a few weeks. Money is effectively no object due to the amount of time this tool saves, versus the frustration of remaking them every week as they fail with what we have attempted thus far:

1) K1045 at around 400MPa yield, visibly bends after a dozen uses.
2) 4140 at around 900MPa, lasts a good few hundred uses.
3) Bohler K245, ( heat treated professionally to around 58 Rc. Lasted a few thousand uses. This was not heat treated in a vaccuum furnace.

Next, we have been given a handful of tool steel options from the local Bohler rep, and were going to send the lot interstate for a more precise, cleaner heat treatment in a vaccuum furnace. Hopefully one of those works. If they end up failing in a month, I want to be prepared to get a little more exotic, for which I was hoping for the help of the experts here. What are everyone's thoughts on:

1) Other, non tool-steels for this application. I was thinking a lot of these hard tool steels are not designed for this kind of fatigue, so I was looking at other UHS steels e.g. Ferrium M54, but I don't know how they would compare.
2) What do we need to watch out for in the heat treat - e.g. as we are going up to high 50 Rc, I assume we are quenching pretty aggressively and not doing a lot of tempering - but would such a thin section attached to such a thick section be subject to massive internal stresses that would be counter productive in that case? How do we control that?
3) I have been thinking about secondary processes like nitriding to put a compressive preload in the tensile surface, but with such a thin section, would there be issues with us just accidentally nitriding most of the section depth, and having the centre of it go too far tensile and thus being counterproductive?

Thanks.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Ed... I wasn't trying to be critical... I have a lot of respect for your comments; I'm not a materials guy... except in passing for other projects. I've never used the material... only had an 'unbreakable' firing pin made from it and 'fatigue' jogged my memory.

Dik
 
btrueblood... not sure why; it has some interesting properties and uses.

As a metallic alloy, I understand the toxicity is eliminated and it is not hazardous to manufacture. I don't know, for sure, about the production process and if a hazard, the material should be avoided.

I should have added that the material and some of its compounds are toxic.

Dik
 
it is tough when the application is not know, but that said when working with hand tools there is nothing more frustrating when a tools fails. and can not do the job properly.
if one looks at a simple wrench made by reliable tool manufactures. they are tough and durable. I suggest do a reverse engineering on those tools. met lab test. spectra analysis.

a high strength steel ( chrome moly ) with a flash chrome for wear and durability.
 
First up, what is the bending stress calculated to be? How is the part loaded? Sounds like it's clearly a fatigue issue so utilizing an ultra high strength steel tempered to max strength might make the problem worse since you usually sacrifice fatigue life for static strength. Also, you absolutely need to minimize the stress concentration at the base of your cantilever as much as possible. Geometry is huge.

With respect to inducing beneficial residual compressive stresses onto the upper surface of your diving board, shot peening would likely be best. That way you aren't limiting the strength of your steel to the nitriding/carburizing process temp. If you really want to nitride, you can spec out a min depth of whatever you want. Going as low as .002'' (.051mm) is totally doable. Again, just watch your temper temp with respect to the nitriding temp.

Tmoose, love the picture haha.
 
"ultra high strength steel tempered to max strength might make the problem worse since you usually sacrifice fatigue life for static strength."

Hunh? Raising the tensile and/or yield strength usually also raises the fatigue limit, see pg. 4 of
Ok, not an "ultra high strength" steel, but the principle should hold. Granted, you can cause some other problems with heat treatment (decarburization, oxididation, quench cracking) that will affect fatigue properties, but those will also generally hurt the tensile and yield strength as well.

Edit: Ok, I was right, I just didn't read far enough. Look on the next page for a similar plot for 300M maraging steel, which I think does qualify as an "ultra high strength steel", and notice how higher strength heat treatment gives higher fatigue life stresses.
 
I am not impressed with toughness and fatigue properties of C300 and C350.
They are strong, but you will get better performance out of the Airmet, M54, or K890.
I would look at nitride for surface treatment, it will provide some compressive stress and wear resistance.
However you need to make sure that you can nitride at a temp that does not exceed the tempering temperature for the alloy.
Otherwise you will be softening it.


= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, Plymouth Tube
 
btrueblood,

You're right. Meant to say fracture toughness. Good catch.
 
I'm wandering if the only stress raiser being on the compressive side means we don't have to worry about notch sensitivity.

Edstainless, I don't really want to use Airmet as it seems to have a prick of a heat treat to go through to get it done, but M54 and K890 both seem doable. Do you have any thoughts between the two of those?

I will nitride as long as I can do it at low enough temp, else I will look into peening.
 
Nitride for this material will not give you the needed compressive stress in comparison to shot peening for improved resistance to fatigue damage. Shot peening to improve resistance to fatigue would be my first choice.
 
There are heat treaters out there that do Airmet for a living, so it isn't that bad.
But yes, the other two are easier.
I feel that is comes down to availability, which can you get?

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, Plymouth Tube
 
Heat treating or shot peen this small thin material will cause distortion. tread carefully.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor