Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

How to Lock a Shaft at Infinitesimal Increments

Status
Not open for further replies.

geometrixeng

Mechanical
Jan 25, 2018
4
Hello Forum,

I am trying to prevent shaft from rotating in BOTH CW and CCW directions when the shaft is subjected to about 2.5 N-m of torque (about 22 in-lbs). The default state of the shaft should be "locked". Then with the push of a button, I want to release the locking mechanism, allow the shaft to rotate to a new angular position, and then release the button so that the shaft remains locked at that new angular position.

The shaft is about .500" in diameter. I CANNOT use a ratchet because I need much more resolution for the angular position where I "lock" the shaft in place. I essentially need infinitesimal angular adjustment. The housing that surrounds the shaft is about 1.000 inch in diameter, so I CANNOT take advantage of a large diameter brake rotor or similar.

I want to complete this task in a fully mechanical design. So I do not want to use any solenoids, stepper motors, gear motors, electronics, MR fluids, or anything of the sort.

I have already tried several designs (3D printed) including:

--Dual torsion spring wrap clutch/brake where the opposing torsion springs prevent the shaft from rotating until the spring ends/tangs are squeezed together -Too much rotational "play" once spring tangs are released.
--Tangential brake shoes that wedge themselves between the shaft and ID of the drum in which the shaft rotates - Way too sensitive to slight variations in part geometry and just not enough holding torque for the small hub/drum diameter.
--Coaster brake design - just not enough holding torque for the small hub/drum diameter.

Any suggestions based upon past experience in this area or just creative brainstorming would be greatly appreciated.

TIA,
--Neal
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I suspect that the dual torsion spring arrangement is the closest that you're going to get to what you're looking for.

John R. Baker, P.E. (ret)
Irvine, CA
Siemens PLM:
UG/NX Museum:

The secret of life is not finding someone to live with
It's finding someone you can't live without
 
I struggle to read most posts, but maybe these type of shaft collars would do the job. A picture usually makes the problem statement more clear. Drill through the collar to mount to your contraption (only one side) -
collar_kxcyx1.png
 
Dividing head?


Politicians like to panic, they need activity. It is their substitute for achievement.
 
"Infinitesimal" sounds like a friction type device. Friction varies quite a bit though. How close to the 22 in/lbs. does it need to be? Repeatability?
 
If a brake poses an issue, could your application use a simple gear reduction and eliminate the need for the brake? An operator could always spin their end of the reduction, your low torque backfeed OTOH couldnt spin the other.
 
Thank you Everybody for your suggestions.

I believe that JohnRBaker's reply may be the best path. I just have to work out the kinks. And yes BrianE22, this probably has to be a friction device in order to achieve the "infintesimal" requirement. I also need to maintain the specified holding torque for about 100,000 cycles. Thanks Pud. I Googled "dividing head" and I do not think that this will meet the requirements as this would take too many manual steps to manually intervene when all I really want to do is have a "push button" release. And DVD, I like the idea. I have thought about this but just haven't yet figured out how to integrate this "mechanism" into the existing housing.

So I am going to keep brainstorming and trying to get this to work. I will post an update once I get this to work.

Thank You,
--Neal
 
Thank you CWB1. I was actually able to do this with a gear motor. The torque required to backdrive the gear motor exceeded the torque requirement. However one of the other requirements for this project is that I cannot use any motors or electronics. Thank you.
 
Hello,

I was thinking of a one way needle bearing roller clutch. The bi-directional use, however, points to John Baker's torsion spring clutch ideas as probably the best solution.
 
The traditional method is a worm gear drive, by changing the angle of the worm you change the 'back drive' force required.


= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, consulting work welcomed
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor