Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations MintJulep on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

How to sweep a circle along helix in 3D

Status
Not open for further replies.

stevethb

Specifier/Regulator
Nov 27, 2008
46
Hi

I want to make something like a wire from old phones, and I need to sweep a circle along helix in 3D. I tried to draw a helix using "radius method - use law" but I don`t know that this option could draw a helix in 3D. Maybe somebody had some ideas how to make it or some tricks ? I`m using now NX6.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Login to GTAC and find their archive of quarterly newsletters. I can't find the exact issue right now, but one of them explained exactly how to do this. Attached is a part file I created a while back per their instructions. I hope it helps.
 
 http://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=6b49105a-2019-43a8-97ca-11defa362c39&file=helix_cord.prt
This is what I was looking for, thanks for your help I will log to GTAC and try to find this.
 
Is this what you wanted?

I know that you'd have thought that you could sweep a circle but it turns out that the orientation of the circular profile relative to the helix is at an oblique. The better way is to simply sweep something like a line to establish an edge that is the centreline of the cord. Having done that you don't need to use a sweep to create a circular profile, you can use a tube feature more easily.

Best Regards

Hudson

www.jamb.com.au

Nil Desperandum illegitimi non carborundum
 
Yes, this cord is what I was looking for, this way to create is like You said less difficult and there is one more thing which I observed. First I was think that it could be solved using single segment tube, but there is a little diference between single and multiple segment tube ( look at the picture ) I think that it could be solved by using smaller tolerance. Very thanks for Your help hudson

Regards
 
 http://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=2a15f848-85ed-4785-997a-ce48c793b8b6&file=tube.jpg
You must be using different geometry for your own example because mine wasn't nearly that bad. There nevertheless was such a problem and try as I may I couldn't get a swept line to stop from kinking at some point along the profile. This is very bad form of NX not to respect the geometry like that and I think it merits looking into. However I was able to come up with one knid of geometry that will yield a correct result. Sadly it isn't parametric, but let's look on the bright side that at least it works.

What I have done is to sweep a circle as we would have done with the line that we used earlier. Having no edges seems to give the system no choice other than to not kink the thing. What I have done next that you may not be able to deduce from the model is to extract an Isoparametric U curve from the swept solid that describes the centreline of the cord. I can't see any kinks in the resulting model this time.

Best Regards

Hudson

www.jamb.com.au

Nil Desperandum illegitimi non carborundum
 
 http://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=7e4e8e93-4974-48e1-9982-ea192275f450&file=cord.prt
This your trick is brilliant, it isn`t parametric but there is a very good continuity of tube. I`m impressed of Your knowledge of using simple tools to create something complicated : ) Thanks for all
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor