Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Humen Bridge 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

jhardy1 (Structural),

Agreed with what you said.

I just want to add the vibration when permitted to continue will eventually lead to the strutural failure by fatique. People seldom investigate if a lamp post or flag pole breaks. They just replace it with another one. The vibration amplitude of a vertical cantilever from a street furniture can be alarmingly large. However each structure has a finite number of stress reversals, usually varies with intensity of the stress, which must be taken into consideration in the maintenace work.
 
Perhaps the added mass from the light at the end of the pole is sufficient to dampen the first mode and result in a second-mode oscillation?
 
@Craig H:
It's not that the first mode is being damped out by the mass of the lights; when you see a light mast swaying in the second mode, the system is being driven by a forcing function with a frequency which is close to the second natural frequency, rather than the first.

Vortices are shed from a cylinder alternately from the lift and right sides, with a frequency which is proportional to the wind speed, forming a "Karman vortex street", generating an oscillating lateral load on the cylinder. When the wind speed is such that the frequency of vortex shedding coincides with a structural frequency, resonance can occur, leading to an amplified response. (And also providing a positive feedback mechanism to lock-in the frequency of vortex shedding with the frequency of vibration.)

A typical light mast will therefore have one wind speed which tends to generate first-mode sway, and a higher wind-speed which tends to generate second-mode sway without generating a simultaneous first-mode response.

 
" added mass from the light at the end of the pole is sufficient to dampen the first mode"

No, adding mass doesn't damp modes, it alters (in every case I can think of, lowers) the resonant frequency.

Cheers

Greg Locock


New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376
 
Thanks for that explanation, folks! The frequency of vortex shedding makes far more sense.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor