BigH
Geotechnical
- Dec 1, 2002
- 6,012
Colleagues:
Thought I would try out our group here. As I indicated, I am at a loss on the subject.
Problem:
1. Subcontractor is bagging fly ash in used 1 tonne bags.
2. Bags previously contained chemicals and we are unsure as to the "purity" of the bags before placing the fly ash into them.
3. Names of the chemicals - that we can surmise at present:
a. Phthalic Anhydride
b. Terephthalic Acid
c. Polyethylene Terephthalate
d. Polyamide 6
Questions:
i. Does any of the above chemicals react adversely with the fly ash? with mix water?
ii. Does any of the above chemical react adversely with fresh concrete?
iii. If so, for the above, at what levels of contamination?
iv. Any long term affects? e.g., expansive effects on aggregates?
Notwithstanding the above, I am leaning to recommending rejection of the fly ash as the bags are not even labeled with respect what they contain - is it really fly ash? No mention as to which source. An ISO 9000 certified company appears to miss the mark on the rudiments of labeling. However, as one knows, politics to get the job done sometimes over-rules such actions. So, any thoughts? Would any of you know a network contact who might be able to give a thought?
Location and project - on the QT.
Thanks for any thoughts . . . (Ron, Iandig, ??)
Thought I would try out our group here. As I indicated, I am at a loss on the subject.
Problem:
1. Subcontractor is bagging fly ash in used 1 tonne bags.
2. Bags previously contained chemicals and we are unsure as to the "purity" of the bags before placing the fly ash into them.
3. Names of the chemicals - that we can surmise at present:
a. Phthalic Anhydride
b. Terephthalic Acid
c. Polyethylene Terephthalate
d. Polyamide 6
Questions:
i. Does any of the above chemicals react adversely with the fly ash? with mix water?
ii. Does any of the above chemical react adversely with fresh concrete?
iii. If so, for the above, at what levels of contamination?
iv. Any long term affects? e.g., expansive effects on aggregates?
Notwithstanding the above, I am leaning to recommending rejection of the fly ash as the bags are not even labeled with respect what they contain - is it really fly ash? No mention as to which source. An ISO 9000 certified company appears to miss the mark on the rudiments of labeling. However, as one knows, politics to get the job done sometimes over-rules such actions. So, any thoughts? Would any of you know a network contact who might be able to give a thought?
Location and project - on the QT.
Thanks for any thoughts . . . (Ron, Iandig, ??)