Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Importance Factor used in serviceablity design? 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

joder

Structural
Aug 5, 2003
22
If you have a builidng that requires an Importance Factor of 1.15 for wind (per ASCE-7), can this factor be waived in non-life safety situations? For example, it is neccesary to design metal stud backup of brick veneer for a deflection criteria of L/600? I don't believe this is addressed in ASCE-7. I would still design for strength because a veneer failure could be a life safety issue. But it seems reasonable to me to waive the 1.15 factor in calculating cladding deflections since no one is going to get hurt if a mortar joint happens to open up during a 3 second gust.

My situation is this: its an outdoor stadium. I = 1.15 because it holds more than 300 people. I think even the 1.15 for MWFRS of the structure is ridiculous because no one is going to occupying an outdoor stadium during a 140 mph hurricane. And I think its even more ridiculous to have to beef the studs up because of that 1.15 factor. It's already conservative enough with the L/600 criteria in my opinion. But I don't see any way out of it.

Which brings up another subject: Can my engineering judgement override the code?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

ASCE does not give the L/600, but it's spreading like wildfire. It started with Brick Institute Tek note 28-B. The L/600 requirement now appears in UFC 3-301-01, Structural Engineering, which is required for all military projects. It is often specifically written into the Statements of Work for military projects.

I think it should go to L/360 per the Canadian research.
 
ASCE doesn't really have anything in terms of deflection criteria. You are correct about the UFC.

IBC lists deflection criteria, but it is not as stringent. L/240 for exterior walls with brittle finishes. IBC allows you to consider wind for deflection as 70% C&C. It also refers in mandatory language to ACI 530. ACI 530 requires L/600 max deflection vertically under D+L load, not horizontally.

So going back to the original question, I see no compelling argument for ignoring the importance factor for deflection. But there's also nothing that requires you to design to L/600 laterally if it's not a military job. L/360 seems appropriate.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor