Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations SSS148 on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

internal pressure for structural design

Status
Not open for further replies.

senthil83

Mechanical
Jun 26, 2012
66
hi,

i am designing a plated structure where client has specified to use

design internal pressure as 660mmWc at 67% yield strength.

as i am designing the Structure to LRFD - IS it Required to Increase the internal Pressure to 100% yield strength

i.e. 660/0.67 = 985 mm wc for Design of Structural Members?

thanks
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

If I'm doing the conversion right, that's over 38 inches of water or 200 psf. This seems pretty high for ASD or LRFD, unless it's blast case or over a very small area with a small effective wind area combined with a hurricane level wind.
 
Is it repeated loading where fatigue would be an issue?
 
mmHg is not a unit I normally use, but it appears to me that it is considerably more than 38 inches of water or 200 psf. Is your client planning to detonate a bomb inside this structure?

660mm = 25.98" mercury or 352" H2O = 29.36' H2O = 1832 psf. Wow!

Edit: This is nonsense. See following posts. Please ignore this post!


BA
 
It says 660mmWc, which I take as 660 mm water column, or about 135 psf.
It didn't indicate this was a building of any kind.
 
Is this a pressurized process vessel? If it is, it's typical to do the design to the ASME standard, with structural loading being secondary to that using a methodology that can be linked to the ASME allowables or that separates the pressure load path from the load path supporting structure.

 
JStephen said:
It says 660mmWc, which I take as 660 mm water column, or about 135 psf.
It didn't indicate this was a building of any kind.
You are correct. I misread the Wc and assumed Hg. My bad!!!!

BA
 
Why is client asking 0.67FY, where did this come from?

Client maybe using the old ASD-89 0.66FY bending for beam, which should have been 0.75FY bending for plate.
 
Assuming the plated structure is not governed by any building codes, why use LRFD when the client specifies 0.67Fy?
 
To directly address the question, though, I would make an equivalent load factor for this pressure load if I wanted to use that criteria and LRFD.

If the standard code check for ring tension would be 0.9Fy, I'd set the load factor such that (0.9Fy)/Factor=(2/3)*Fy. So your load factor would be 1.35.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor