petrotech50
Petroleum
Just wanted your opinions on what works best for you in a vacuum tower for MVGO. We are cosidering a guided wave radar and also a Displacer. What are your suggestions?
Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations TugboatEng on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
Level instrument on vacuum tower
- Thread starter petrotech50
- Start date
- Status
Basic options for level measurement are;
1. hydrostatic (pressure at the bottom of the liquid column)
This will be sensitive to headspace pressure and density of the liquid. Headspace pressure can be accounted for by measuring it and using the differential pressure to imply the liquid level, taking into account the density. If density varies then a third pressure sensor a known height above the bottom sensor is needed. The fluid density can be derived from this pressure differential.
2. Float and position measurement (I think this is a displacer type you refer to?)
A physical float and LVDT will provide a reliable level independent of vessel pressure. This system will be sensitive to density variations due to the float floating higher or lower.
3. Ultrasonic or Radar (distance measurement based on time of flight for a sound or radio wave)
Time of flight for reflected waves is independent of vessel pressure and fluid density. Ultrasonic (sound) can be affected by headspace density and other sources of reflections in the tank eg agitator blades and baffles. For a vacuum vessel application where variable vapour levels exist there may be an un reliable measurement. Radar is immune to headspace density variations, but more sensitive to tank internal reflections. This has been solved by the use of a guide (aerial) to reduce the false echoes.
4. Discrete level switches.
Simple robust switch at the level the process needs to be controlled to. If the control requirement is on at level 1 and off at level 2 then 2 switches can be used to reliably solve the problem.
The answer depends upon process requirements – accuracy, switching range, fulid and process conditions etc.
Mark Hutton
1. hydrostatic (pressure at the bottom of the liquid column)
This will be sensitive to headspace pressure and density of the liquid. Headspace pressure can be accounted for by measuring it and using the differential pressure to imply the liquid level, taking into account the density. If density varies then a third pressure sensor a known height above the bottom sensor is needed. The fluid density can be derived from this pressure differential.
2. Float and position measurement (I think this is a displacer type you refer to?)
A physical float and LVDT will provide a reliable level independent of vessel pressure. This system will be sensitive to density variations due to the float floating higher or lower.
3. Ultrasonic or Radar (distance measurement based on time of flight for a sound or radio wave)
Time of flight for reflected waves is independent of vessel pressure and fluid density. Ultrasonic (sound) can be affected by headspace density and other sources of reflections in the tank eg agitator blades and baffles. For a vacuum vessel application where variable vapour levels exist there may be an un reliable measurement. Radar is immune to headspace density variations, but more sensitive to tank internal reflections. This has been solved by the use of a guide (aerial) to reduce the false echoes.
4. Discrete level switches.
Simple robust switch at the level the process needs to be controlled to. If the control requirement is on at level 1 and off at level 2 then 2 switches can be used to reliably solve the problem.
The answer depends upon process requirements – accuracy, switching range, fulid and process conditions etc.
Mark Hutton
petrotech50,
I am not an instrumentation specialist, but i have noticed that modern vacuum towers use nucleonic level transmitters. Two of the recent vacuum towers I've worked on used this type of level control. I was asked to design the vessel clips for the nuclear source and detector.
Browsing through the internet, I have read that radar level detectors does not work well in vacuum towers because of interference from inlet vapor or steam. (sorry forgot the website)
Here's a website for an overview of different level instruments
I am not an instrumentation specialist, but i have noticed that modern vacuum towers use nucleonic level transmitters. Two of the recent vacuum towers I've worked on used this type of level control. I was asked to design the vessel clips for the nuclear source and detector.
Browsing through the internet, I have read that radar level detectors does not work well in vacuum towers because of interference from inlet vapor or steam. (sorry forgot the website)
Here's a website for an overview of different level instruments
A lot of times on a distillation column or any large vessel you are better off to measure the liquid level in a pipe attached to the side of the column. With an inlet and outlet but really no flow other than level changes. Then you could put a guided wave radar in the top of the pipe and still have a sight glass or magnetic displacement float on the side of the pipe to either field verify the readings or just give you a second reading.
Regards
StoneCold
Regards
StoneCold
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Question
- Locked
- Question
