GGH
Petroleum
- Oct 27, 2001
- 8
In my experience there is a disconnect between materials theory:
which discusses material properties in terms of dislocation movement, grain structures (Austenite, ferrite, HCP etc.), thermal history, etc.
and materials practice which talks in terms of standards which give you macro properties (ASME VIII, PD 5500, etc.), recipes (e.g. ASTM) and corrosion properties (NACE, manufacturers, etc).
Is anyone aware of reference material that bridges the gap and describes materials theory in the context of standard materials? E.g. 316 stainless steel differs from 304 in that it contains 2% molybdenum, this molybdenum is added to enhance corrosion properties, the material is Austenitic and hence has good ductility at low temperatures … … …
which discusses material properties in terms of dislocation movement, grain structures (Austenite, ferrite, HCP etc.), thermal history, etc.
and materials practice which talks in terms of standards which give you macro properties (ASME VIII, PD 5500, etc.), recipes (e.g. ASTM) and corrosion properties (NACE, manufacturers, etc).
Is anyone aware of reference material that bridges the gap and describes materials theory in the context of standard materials? E.g. 316 stainless steel differs from 304 in that it contains 2% molybdenum, this molybdenum is added to enhance corrosion properties, the material is Austenitic and hence has good ductility at low temperatures … … …