lilylucyleo
Mechanical
- Jun 16, 2015
- 3
Hello everyone,
I am a new member of STAAD user club. Happy to talk to senior users in the forum.
I am doing a p-delta analysis to a tent, which is steel framed and reinforced by steel tension cables. I tried to use "PERFORM ANALYSIS" only and the maximum steel compliance ratio, as per CSA S16 is around 1.6. But when I tried to use p-delta analysis, the ratio went up to 3.1. So I looked up the steel design details, and found that the MZ moment is 2.18 Knm,while f using "PERFORM ANALYSIS", MZ is around 0.5 KNM.I used "REPEAT LOAD" instead of "LOAD COMBINATIONS".
I think it is due to the additional moment caused by p-delta effect. But I am really confused with such large differences. I have been tried 2D structure with p-delta analysis, the result is 1.7. Also if the tension-only cables were removed, the code compliance ratio will be 1.7, just slightly higher than the conventional analysis.
I attached the snapshot of my 3D tent, the steel design code together with the postprocessing results. I will be very happy if some expert can give me explanation whether the analysis is correct and which ratio should I believe.
The snapshots are:
Thanks a lot!
Fio
I am a new member of STAAD user club. Happy to talk to senior users in the forum.
I am doing a p-delta analysis to a tent, which is steel framed and reinforced by steel tension cables. I tried to use "PERFORM ANALYSIS" only and the maximum steel compliance ratio, as per CSA S16 is around 1.6. But when I tried to use p-delta analysis, the ratio went up to 3.1. So I looked up the steel design details, and found that the MZ moment is 2.18 Knm,while f using "PERFORM ANALYSIS", MZ is around 0.5 KNM.I used "REPEAT LOAD" instead of "LOAD COMBINATIONS".
I think it is due to the additional moment caused by p-delta effect. But I am really confused with such large differences. I have been tried 2D structure with p-delta analysis, the result is 1.7. Also if the tension-only cables were removed, the code compliance ratio will be 1.7, just slightly higher than the conventional analysis.
I attached the snapshot of my 3D tent, the steel design code together with the postprocessing results. I will be very happy if some expert can give me explanation whether the analysis is correct and which ratio should I believe.
The snapshots are:
Thanks a lot!
Fio