Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

PCB tolerancing

Status
Not open for further replies.

noslo21

Mechanical
May 12, 2006
15
US
Is there anyone here that knows what kind of tolerances can be held on a PCB in production from the edge to the center of a hole on and from edge to edge of a board as well. I'm looking for the best case tolerance without adding significant cost.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Hi Noslo21

Routing a board is usually plus minus .005".

Tofflemire
 
The best bet is to ask this question of the board makers because they constantly upgrade their processes and so will know the latest facts. Once they tell you you can decide if you need to push them or can live with the standard.

Keith Cress
Flamin Systems, Inc.-
 
It depends on what you call out on the PCB drawing. Tofflemire is correct in that routing is typically +/-.005. But their are other edge details that can be specified such as scoring. It really depends on the volume and your assembly processes.

Best Regards,

Heckler
Sr. Mechanical Engineer
SW2005 SP 5.0 & Pro/E 2001
Dell Precision 370
P4 3.6 GHz, 1GB RAM
XP Pro SP2.0
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1400
o
_`\(,_
(_)/ (_)

Never argue with an idiot. They'll bring you down to their level and beat you with experience every time.
 
noslo21-
I can give you pattern-locating and in-pattern positonal tolerance on holes in GD&T terms. Would that help?

The problem I've always encountered is the PCB designers don't understand GD&T and/or their drafting software does not have provisions for showing the symbols. Of course most are either disinterested or too busy to learn something that seems inconsequental to them when they've used RFS bilateral dimensioning "all these years without any problems" (although IPC preaches the stuff)!

I did a survey once with ten major PCB mfgrs and they understood GD&T and provided (after much cajoling and coaxing to speak the TRUTH instead of CYA) fairly consistent data. I'll share the data but can not provide the sources.


Tunalover
 
Tunalover,

I would be very interested in this data. I have no problems geometric dimensioning and tolerancing. As a matter of fact, I wish that more companies would adopt this as a sole method of dimensioning their drawings. It just solves to many problems (assuming that a supplier can understand it) with ease.
 
noslo21-
I am on personal leave for a few days and the data is at the office. I'll look for it and forward it on.

What I have found is that the larger mfgrs actually do understand the method. It's their customers that don't!


Tunalover
 
Roughly speaking:

Registration Drill To Datum: 0.05mm
Outline Tolerance-Punching: 0.2mm
Outline Tolerance-Routing: 0.127mm

Hope this helps

CJ
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top