Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Pipin Acoustic Vibration caused by strainer? | Strainer Design Philosophy 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

thermmech

Mechanical
Dec 13, 2004
103
We are experiencing a vibration / noise in a stretch of 38" piping downstream from compressor to the first heat exchanger. In this stretch of piping there is a conical strainer with fine mesh. Recently we have removed the fine mesh from the strainer perforated plate (basket). There was no noise while mesh was installed.

The noise levels are extremely high (up to 120 dBA), dominant vibration frequency range is from 500 - 100 Hz, vibration velocity and amplitude = 0.040 mm/s and 0.01 mm max. We have shut down the compressor to prevent high-frequency fatigue of piping and SBCs.

A number of hypotheses for the noise cause has been proposed (high probability listed first):

1. Improper strainer installation (strainer "spiders" not fully engaged into the pipe ID allowing front strainer end to move - not possible to verify until basket pulled out)
2. Vortex shedding through perforated plate (recently removed fine mesh)
3. A foreign body lodged upstream into pipe reducer (not likely, pipe ID very large)
4. Fluid oscillations caused by compressor (not likely, examined compressor vibration and operation data and no indications)

Q-1:
Till we get more data and open the strainer, I would like to understand which hypotheses above are reasonable? Is it reasonable to expect to create vortex shedding or some sort of fluid-elastic vibration of strainer basket (perforated plate) when fine mesh is removed?

Q-2:
Our strainer philosophy was only to provide 200% "open area" through the fine mesh. No other criteria was set (CFD, stiffness, Rho-v2 threshold, etc. Could anyone give me some pointers to proper strainer selection and design? Our plant is a clean gas plant with mostly T (basket in a Tee) and C-type (conical) strainers ranging in size from 12 to 80".
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Apologies, I need to correct:
dominant vibration frequency range is from 500 - [highlight #A40000]1,000[/highlight] Hz, vib
 
I could see the fine mesh screen acting as an acoustic barrier to 500-1000 Hz "noise" being propagated downstream, and the compressor being a source of 500-1000 Hz vibrations. Is the accelerometer located d/s from the strainer?
 
Vibration measurements taken from compressor header to exchanger, including strainer.
 

We have opened the strainer, removed the basket and reinstated the piping. The high noise accompanied by low amplitude vibration is gone.

However, we have now detected another strainer basket where noise level is somewhat increased:

105 dBA, 3.36 RMS mm/s velocity, 826 Hz

Is there any danger of operating
1. long term (2years)
2. 1 month?

 
Are these vibration measurements perpendicular to the pipe wall?
If the sensor is slid around the pipe does the amplitude vary?
I'm kind of expecting the vibration is a phenomenon related to a mode of the pipe wall -\
not the bending etc that piping system support calculations generally worry about.

In either case petty detailed stress "calculations" would be necessary to determine what is harmful.

If resonance is involved I'd expect there are ways to re-tune or damp the system to reduce the vibration and the concerns.
 
Yes, we are worried about pipe shell mode vibrations - we will employ stress measurements to calculate fatigue life. Just wanted to understand whether measured values are clearly high (requiring shutdown) or not.
 
3.36 mm/sec RMS velocity is very low; is this correct?
I do not believe that there can be 200% open area when the entire area is 100%; perhaps you mean 50% open or something else?

Walt
 
3mm/s RMS is very low but frequency is high

200% strainer open area is correct, strainer cone is long
 
All sounds a bit unlikely to me. what is your actual flow velocity in this section of pipe? Pipe size, flow rate and pressure would be useful to understand.

why not just put some less fine mesh back in if that was the issues? Or just remove it. What is it protecting downstream from a compressor??

In line strainers like this are not the best solution long term because, as you say there are no real specifications. I once used 3mm stl steel with punched holes and it was just as well - it took 20 bar differential (yes twenty bar) during commissioning and only bent a bit. The very thin commissioning strainer we refused to put in would have broken long before that and deposited all manner of stuff into the compressor...

My motto: Learn something new every day

Also: There's usually a good reason why everyone does it that way
 
We are opening the strainer today... we'll see what happened.
 
strainer opened, basket damaged, but installed properly
op parameters and all else is as before the problem started
except that the mesh was removed in the meantime
vortex shedding?
 
I feel it is safe to report that this was a case of acoustic vibration caused by vortex shedding.

Basket was damaged by vibration, upon its removal vibration and noise disappeared.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor