ronjon322
Civil/Environmental
- Feb 18, 2014
- 20
Help me wrap my head around this?
I am familiar with ACI 318 and ACI 350 minimum and maximum reinforcement spacing, flexural and temp & shrink limits, shear, etc. However, I have concerns about just how much rebar congestion results in using a typical 6" o/c spacing with #6 and #7 rebar or even #8 and #9 when needed. I prefer to use 8" or 9" o/c with a larger bar size. What is the preferred and more common design practices? Nominal aggregate sizes are 3/4" - 1" dia. I get nervous about designing an entire structure using 6" o/c spacing, each way.
This is typically for in-ground rectangular wastewater treatment tanks with 18" - 30" walls and foundations and other heavy flood control hydraulic structures. Typical dimensions of structures may be 50' x 50'x 25' H or larger.
Thanks for your input.
P.S. Sorry if this is a repeat. I tried to post this earlier this morning, but it didn't seem to work.
I am familiar with ACI 318 and ACI 350 minimum and maximum reinforcement spacing, flexural and temp & shrink limits, shear, etc. However, I have concerns about just how much rebar congestion results in using a typical 6" o/c spacing with #6 and #7 rebar or even #8 and #9 when needed. I prefer to use 8" or 9" o/c with a larger bar size. What is the preferred and more common design practices? Nominal aggregate sizes are 3/4" - 1" dia. I get nervous about designing an entire structure using 6" o/c spacing, each way.
This is typically for in-ground rectangular wastewater treatment tanks with 18" - 30" walls and foundations and other heavy flood control hydraulic structures. Typical dimensions of structures may be 50' x 50'x 25' H or larger.
Thanks for your input.
P.S. Sorry if this is a repeat. I tried to post this earlier this morning, but it didn't seem to work.