Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

RePad in two pieces

Status
Not open for further replies.

Josep Maria Perdigo

Mechanical
Feb 22, 2017
23
0
0
ES
In the framework of ASME VIII-1, can I make a RePad in two pieces? (See attached figure)
The welds between the two parts would be butt. There would be a ventilation hole in each part.
Can the longitudinal welds be considered as category A and the circumferential category B as per Fig UW-3?
Thanks for your opinions.
 
 http://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=63ef47b7-bd37-42e5-b555-dc8cd381f4b4&file=RePad_in_two_pieces.jpg
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Josep Maria Perdigo, please read UG-37(h) . I'd say this weld is not categorized.

Regards,

Mike

The problem with sloppy work is that the supply FAR EXCEEDS the demand
 
The repad is suppose to be seamless and you can only equal it by cat A 100% RT. Then attach it transverse, Longverse,reverse in anyway you please.

General Blr. CA,USA
 
GenB,
Not sure what you are stating but:
Repad can be in two pieces....seamless is not required.
Weld in two-piece repad is not categorized.
Attach the two-piece repad with weld transverse to the longitudinal axis of the horizontal vessel, and save the money that would be spent on RT.
 
SnTMan already pointed to UG-37(h) which explicitly allows for two piece repads without 100% RT. However, unless A[sub]5[/sub] is decreased, the seam must not be less than 45° off the long axis. The weld seam can be transverse to the long axis (and from a hoop stress perspective this is optimal), but it does not have to be. A very simplistic look at the geometry and thinking about the joint efficiency of a non-RT Category A joint ties together nicely. Although it doesn't apply to repads, Fig. UG-37 at 45° also provides a bit of logic to the ~70-75% joint efficiency which is otherwise given by Div. 1 to the effective strength of a repad.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top