AeroNat12
Aerospace
- Mar 28, 2014
- 3
I'd like to talk through the factors involved in using rivets vs bolts/screws in thin walled structures.
The problem I'm working with today is a piece of prototype equipment, constructed from an aluminum box frame made of .060" square extrusion (taking bending loads) with .040" skins (taking shear loads), fastened together with blind rivets. This was provided to us by a contractor. I don't have full design/structural details. I am tasked to modify it to carry additional equipment, which I planned to do by riveting fittings onto the frame (remove existing rivets, add fitting & match drill existing holes, secure fitting and structure with new rivets). Some of my colleagues are pushing to fasten the fittings with bolts instead "in case" we ever want to remove the fittings.
I'm not sure if my (brief) aviation background combined with a lack of access to the structural analysis is making me overly conservative, or if my concerns about doing this are valid. This is not safety critical, but it would be nice not to scrap the prototype. I'd like to validate some of my assumptions about fastening thin walled structures with a more general discussion anyways.
General Case:
- For an equal number and diameter of rivets vs bolts, are there any cracking, fatigue, bearing, etc. considerations? Presumably rivets are better for all of these factors.
- Should knock down factors on bearing strength for a line of bolts vs a line of rivets? I'm thinking the bolt clearances would cause loading to be less evenly distributed than for rivets.
This design case:
- By using bolts, I'll be left with a combination of bolts and rivets. With the larger clearance in the bolted connections, the remaining rivets will take more load before the bolts are loaded up.
- I could envision cracks being likely to start at one of the bolted connections with higher stress concentrations.
The problem I'm working with today is a piece of prototype equipment, constructed from an aluminum box frame made of .060" square extrusion (taking bending loads) with .040" skins (taking shear loads), fastened together with blind rivets. This was provided to us by a contractor. I don't have full design/structural details. I am tasked to modify it to carry additional equipment, which I planned to do by riveting fittings onto the frame (remove existing rivets, add fitting & match drill existing holes, secure fitting and structure with new rivets). Some of my colleagues are pushing to fasten the fittings with bolts instead "in case" we ever want to remove the fittings.
I'm not sure if my (brief) aviation background combined with a lack of access to the structural analysis is making me overly conservative, or if my concerns about doing this are valid. This is not safety critical, but it would be nice not to scrap the prototype. I'd like to validate some of my assumptions about fastening thin walled structures with a more general discussion anyways.
General Case:
- For an equal number and diameter of rivets vs bolts, are there any cracking, fatigue, bearing, etc. considerations? Presumably rivets are better for all of these factors.
- Should knock down factors on bearing strength for a line of bolts vs a line of rivets? I'm thinking the bolt clearances would cause loading to be less evenly distributed than for rivets.
This design case:
- By using bolts, I'll be left with a combination of bolts and rivets. With the larger clearance in the bolted connections, the remaining rivets will take more load before the bolts are loaded up.
- I could envision cracks being likely to start at one of the bolted connections with higher stress concentrations.