Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Robertson Section 3 Roof Deck Diaphragm Shear Capacity

Status
Not open for further replies.

DannyVang

Structural
Mar 17, 2015
6
I am reviewing a set of old drawings (September 1973) and wanted to see if anyone has any information to determine the allowable diaphragm shear capacity for a 1 ½” Robertson “Q” No. 3 metal deck with welds per the attached; metal deck spans 7.5 feet maximum. I have a 1975 Robertson catalog but it refers to a Robertson representative for the diaphragm capacity.

Any input is appreciated.

Thanks.
 
 http://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=09fda358-0bda-4ddf-b850-8b04ee59f7b2&file=Penthouse_Roof.pdf
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I tried slideruleera's website, and that's where I downloaded the 1975 catalog but it doesn't contain the information I am looking for.
 
Perhaps you can find a modern deck profile that's close enough for you to assume that the capacities would be close. I believe that the only non-fastener deck related failure mode is panel shear buckling. And, for that, you only need similar EI values. 7'-6" is a pretty good span for 1.5 inch deck. Shear buckling may well govern.

I kinda dig detail H as a deck edge collector/chord strategy. No field welding and no seat roll over. Maybe I'll try and bring that back.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.
 
I thought about doing that and looked at ASC B-36 and Verco Type PLB-36/HSB-36 roof decks but their width is 36" instead of Robertson's which is 24". Also the weld patterns for ASC and Verco's deck are different than what's specified on Robertson's.

I like to avoid extensive calculations due to budget constraints.
 
I hear 'ya. With respect to shear buckling, I'm not sure that deck width matters much so long as the Ix/ft is on target. And, if you look at values for short deck spans where shear buckling won't govern, you should be able to come up with lb/fastener capacities.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.
 
If you do a "search" in this forum using "ROBERTSON Deck", there are many threads that will come up. Maybe one has the information you need.

Mike McCann, PE, SE (WA)


 
At msquare48 - I tried that already with no success. Thanks for your suggestion though.

At KootK - I haven't had to revert to providing the calc's you suggested; had always been able to rely on the published values from the catalogs. I am curious now as to how they obtain the shear capacity values they published in their catalogs. I know someone who works for ASC and will contact him for additional recommendations.
 
Any chance you have access to SDI's Diaphragm Design Manual? It's all in there. Of course, it's expensive and not exactly a page turner.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.
 
No, I don't have SDI's manual, probably because I never need to...thanks for your input.
 
Slideruleera's site did have a Robertson No. 3 - 1 1/2" deck. I didn't see the "Q" you refer to though.



Check out Eng-Tips Forum's Policies here:
faq731-376
 
JAE - I didn't see the "Q" as shown in the As-Built drawing also in the 1975 Robertson catalog.

wannabeSE - At a glance, I think this may be what I am looking for. Thanks!!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor