Burunduk
Mechanical
- May 2, 2019
- 2,455
I don’t want to hijack jimbid20’s thread too much, so I’m posting this here.
I’d like to get everyone’s opinion:
Looking at this modified figure from the standard, do you see any issues with B@MMB as secondary and C@RMB as tertiary?
I think there might be a problem because you might not be able to use the full shift from the difference between the OB’s RAME and the 40.2 diameter of datum simulator B.
I also don't see how this datum scheme can mimic any functional application.
I’d like to get everyone’s opinion:
Looking at this modified figure from the standard, do you see any issues with B@MMB as secondary and C@RMB as tertiary?
I think there might be a problem because you might not be able to use the full shift from the difference between the OB’s RAME and the 40.2 diameter of datum simulator B.
I also don't see how this datum scheme can mimic any functional application.
