Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations pierreick on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

SIF an Corrosion Allowance

Status
Not open for further replies.

saplanti

Mechanical
Nov 27, 2007
780
Greetings,

I have not thought about it before, but one of my fellow engineers asked me after I handed in my spreadsheet for SIF calculation, and my calculation spreadsheet did not include the corrosion allowance either.

I have checked ASME B31.3 Table D300 for Flexibility factor and SIF, and could not find the answer I was looking for. The table Notes (4) is defines:

Tbar = for elbows and miter bends, the nominal wall thickness of the fitting,
Tbar = for Tees, the nominal wall thickness of the matching pipe.

I have thought that the code calculations are based on the corroded wall thicknesses, and the code does not support it in any way as far as I checked.

In case there is a small corrosion allowance available the value does not change much. But if the corrosion allowance is 3 mm and greater the changes become very large with small diameter pipe sizes.

At the moment I do not have Caesar II software to check to see what Caesar II considers for the SIF calculation.

Therefore, I would like to get your valuable opinion on the issue.


Thanks in advance and kind regards,

Ibrahim Demir
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Greetings again,

It is interesting that the only code CODETI C3.2.6.3 Notation for "ef" gives the following explanation for the thickness in SIF applications:

"ef = Thickness of reference used to calculate the constraints: the half-thickness a range of tolerances and c1- c1+ less corrosion allowance or possible erosion (see Note 1 and 2).

Note1. The determination of the stress from a well defined thickness can be very conservative in so far as the corrosion or erosion leading to sub-thickness are in the vast majority of localized cases.
In agreement with the Principal validation behavior for the network can be based on a verification of the constraints taken into account these phenomena only for areas potentially affected."

The translation into English may not be 100% correct but the concept is more or less defined.

I guess this is valid for all the standards; however I still can not get this validated by ASME B31.3.

Regards,

Ibrahim Demir
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor