Comment on skogsgurra (Electrical) Jan 10, 2004 marked ///\\Sorry jb,
Why should I rephrase my question "in standard filter terminology"? (I guess that you mean number of poles, filter type, passband ripple, slope and the like, but I do not think that this would lead to the kind of answer I am looking for).
///Normally, the standard terminology is used to facilitate an effective communication in specific engineering areas, avoids ambiguities and removal of posting in this Forum (as mine for example).\\I asked for design rules
///There are various design rules, e.g. design procedure, specification, description, guide, handbook, etc. None of them explicitely have been posted yet. Are you abandoning these?\\ for sine filters for PWM inverter outputs. There are many such filters available - and I have used several brands - but since they seem to perform quite differently with respect to losses, resulting waveform, dynamic performance, space and cost, I am interested in getting information from as many quarters as possible so that I can find out what design parameters have been important for different producers.
///Often, design parameters and specific values, included graphs tend to be proprietary.\\So I repeat: I humbly asked for topology *and* design rules. If anyone have such available.
///More detail information what is actually requested would help.\\\