Xcenterline
Structural
- Oct 18, 2011
- 8
Need some advice. I have a single story all steel structure (OCBF S-R system) on Soil Classification E. The foundation design used elsewhere (in better soils!) employs simple shallow spread footings with a mono-pour slab above (thickened edges around the perimeter.
Now, with Soil Classification E, I need to tie all the footings together. I assume this code requirement means that both orthogonal directions need to be accommodated.
My real concern here is that the foot print of this building is quite odd. Columns are not on a nice grid. In fact, few columns really line up nicely (thanks Mr. Architect!) in either direction.
Any insights here that anyone can share?
On thought I had was to use thickened "beam" sections in the mono pour slab. I could provide dowels at the spread footings to create a positive connection to the slab-beams. Similar to a stiffened slab, but the beams won't all line up nicely due to the odd column layout. Rather, I would consider thickening the slab (plus added reinforcing) to use it as a diaphragm rather than place intersecting slab-beams into lateral bending as a result of misaligned grid. Thoughts?
Note that the building is about 100 ft x 100 ft.
Now, with Soil Classification E, I need to tie all the footings together. I assume this code requirement means that both orthogonal directions need to be accommodated.
My real concern here is that the foot print of this building is quite odd. Columns are not on a nice grid. In fact, few columns really line up nicely (thanks Mr. Architect!) in either direction.
Any insights here that anyone can share?
On thought I had was to use thickened "beam" sections in the mono pour slab. I could provide dowels at the spread footings to create a positive connection to the slab-beams. Similar to a stiffened slab, but the beams won't all line up nicely due to the odd column layout. Rather, I would consider thickening the slab (plus added reinforcing) to use it as a diaphragm rather than place intersecting slab-beams into lateral bending as a result of misaligned grid. Thoughts?
Note that the building is about 100 ft x 100 ft.