Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations The Obturator on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Solidworks and

Status
Not open for further replies.

mrMikee

Structural
Apr 23, 2005
528
I am working with another company that wants to use Solidworks (a parametric solid modeling program) to design bins, batchers, and support structures. While I do understand the advantages of 3D and solid modeling for machines and assemblies, I am reluctant the jump on board at this point in time for using it on buildings and building type structures, in particular when each job is significantly different. Does anyone have some experience with this and/or opinions?

Regards,
-Mike
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

The marketing of CAD for years has suggested that CAD (and now solid modeling) will make our problems go away. It is my opinion that good organization, modular products, bills of materials, and configuration management are still important. In fact, maybe even more important.

Thanks for all the comments.

Regards,
-Mike
 
We use Solidworks for designing stair and platform systems. It seems to work pretty well, but we have a number of crashes. It is geared more toward mechanical/machine design, which suits the larger division of our company.
 
At issue here is the use of a "Mechanical" Package to do a "System".

Solidworks, as Agman says, is not set up to do systems. There are 3D parametric Programs that are. They cost a large amount of money.

Ford would not design a car with solidwords. Boeing would not design an airplane with solidworks. It is good for small assemblies and pars (as agman suggested).

However, I think it is a mistake to write off ALL 3D programs for civil/structural type work.

The reason that these programs exist as mechanical packages is because manufacturers have invested LARGE sums of money, and are willing to pay $15,000 per seat (sometimes more) for the software. The method of doing business, in the construction industry is different. This practice would send most firms out of business (just based on the shear investment of developing the software). But now it is developed. And I can be added onto for This NEW type of work. But it is going to take people in these industries USING the software, and giving feedback to the software companies to make it work for building industry.

Guys, Solidworks is low investment. You can get a seat of it for I think about $4000. But just remember... you get what you pay for!

Wes C.
------------------------------
There are no engineers in the hottest parts of hell, because the existence of a 'hottest part' implies a temperature difference, and any marginally competent engineer would immediately use this to run a heat engine and make some other part of hell comfortably cool. This is obviously impossible.
 
It would be like pumping New Orleans dry with a hand cranked syphon and a garden hose.

Wes C.
------------------------------
There are no engineers in the hottest parts of hell, because the existence of a 'hottest part' implies a temperature difference, and any marginally competent engineer would immediately use this to run a heat engine and make some other part of hell comfortably cool. This is obviously impossible.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor