StrEng007
Structural
- Aug 22, 2014
- 510
When designing isolated spread footings along a building line, when do you need to determine if the length of your footing requires consideration of the soil interaction?
For typical spread footings, the ACI design approach is to consider the bearing capacity of the soil and the upward force that induces tension and shear at the footing's critical sections (and of course FOS for bearing, OT, and all that good stuff). However, couldn't it be said that if a spread footing is long enough that soil interaction (soil spring constant) becomes an issue?
I have a building I've designed for several spread footings equally spaced along a single gridline. These footings support gravity and lateral overturn, where the lateral is all pushing the same direction. The design calls for footings to be long enough (parallel to gridline) to where they encroach on each other. At that point, I've now switched my analysis over to looking at a beam on elastic foundation. Interestingly, you get a similar volume of concrete either way.
For typical spread footings, the ACI design approach is to consider the bearing capacity of the soil and the upward force that induces tension and shear at the footing's critical sections (and of course FOS for bearing, OT, and all that good stuff). However, couldn't it be said that if a spread footing is long enough that soil interaction (soil spring constant) becomes an issue?
I have a building I've designed for several spread footings equally spaced along a single gridline. These footings support gravity and lateral overturn, where the lateral is all pushing the same direction. The design calls for footings to be long enough (parallel to gridline) to where they encroach on each other. At that point, I've now switched my analysis over to looking at a beam on elastic foundation. Interestingly, you get a similar volume of concrete either way.