Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations GregLocock on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

T-Scale vs Rockwell 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

DaveMS

Materials
May 15, 2002
2
I am fairly new to metallurgy (my background is in Ceramics), and have a question about hardness. I understand the principal of measuring hardness using a Vicker's or Rockwell, and understand how these differ.
My question is how/where does a 'T-Scale' fit in? I requested some Rockwell B data from one of our steel suppliers, and he sent me data that is 'T Scale' and then converted to Rockwell B.
Is this generally acceptable practice? Is it more/less acceptable than Vickers or Rockwell B?
Is there any good articles/reading where I can learn more about T scale hardness?
Thanks for any information
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I believe you received data from Rockwell superficial testing. There are three types, 15T, 30T, and 45T. They all use a 1/16 inch diameter ball (just like the Rockwell B test), but they use different forces (15, 30, and 45 kgf rather than 100 kgf).

It is not generally acceptable practice to substitute one hardness test for another without prior agreement from the customer. The conversions are usually accurate for steels, but less so for other materials. The real concern is that smaller volumes are involved with superficial tests, so it is possible that hardness contributions from multiphase materials, and thus overall hardness, may be variable with respect to applied force.

Good information is available in the ASM Handbook Volume 8, Mechanical Testing and Evaluation available at:

 
CoryPad:
I appreciate the information, and you have cleared things up a bit for me. The supplier has used 30T, and now I understand what he did. I have a few more questions:
1) Is 30T acceptable for 1.8mm cold rolled strip steel?
2) Is the 'T' measurement in effect the 'raw' data for the Rockwell B?
3) He converts it to Rockwell B - is this an exact conversion (like inches to cm), or an empirical conversion (like Rockwell to Vickers)?
Again, thanks for the response.
 
The T measurement was the raw data.

The conversion is empirical, just like Rockwell to Vickers.

A Rockwell 30T measurement should be acceptable for 1.8 mm thick strip steel.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor