StruteK
Civil/Environmental
- Jan 8, 2012
- 8
Hi,
Is there a reason for the wedge anchor to be more commonly used than the "Tapcon" for example:
LDT (large diameter tapcon) by RED HEAD with 5/8" diameter and 3.5" embedment has an ultimate cap. of 7972 Lbs on tension and 10224 Lbs on Shear.
Vs
Trubolt (Wedge Anchor) by RED HHEAD with 5/8" diameter and 5-1/8" embedment(note that it is 1-5/6" more) has a ultimate capacity of 6580 Lbs. in Tension and 9600 Lbs. in shear.
Both are on 2000 psi concrete
Comparing the two I question why is the wedge anchor still being used if tapcons are easier to install? Where would you install a wedge anchor instead of a tapcon?
Please comment..
Is there a reason for the wedge anchor to be more commonly used than the "Tapcon" for example:
LDT (large diameter tapcon) by RED HEAD with 5/8" diameter and 3.5" embedment has an ultimate cap. of 7972 Lbs on tension and 10224 Lbs on Shear.
Vs
Trubolt (Wedge Anchor) by RED HHEAD with 5/8" diameter and 5-1/8" embedment(note that it is 1-5/6" more) has a ultimate capacity of 6580 Lbs. in Tension and 9600 Lbs. in shear.
Both are on 2000 psi concrete
Comparing the two I question why is the wedge anchor still being used if tapcons are easier to install? Where would you install a wedge anchor instead of a tapcon?
Please comment..