Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations SSS148 on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Temperature drop in gas pressure regulator for CNG

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jezovuk

Mechanical
Dec 13, 2010
57
Best regards! I' am mechanical engineer from Krajina and I have a task to construct gas pressure regulator for compressed natural gas. Here are some characteristics of the regulator:
Inlet pressure: 250 bar
Outlet pressure: 4 bar
Volume flow: 100 m^3/h
Inlet diameter: 1/2"
Outlet diameter: 1"
Gas is heated up to 80 C infront od the regulator by gas exchanger. I have following formula that circulates within the company and is considered to be "true" but I'm a bit sceptical about it:

to- ti= 0.4(pi- pr)+ (tr- ti)

to- gas temp.on heat excanger's outlet
ti- gas temp.on heat excanger's inlet (5 C)
pi- gas pressure on heat excanger's inlet
pr- gas pressure after reduction
tr- gas temp.after eduction
0.4(C/bar)- Joule Thomson's efect.

When I calculate temp.using that formula I get tr= -18.4 C.
I have also calculated temp.drop as adiabatic process by

T2= T1(p2/p1)^k-1/k and got T2= -108.255 C
k- adiabatic exponent (1.31 for nat.gas)

Can any of upper formula give me approximately real picture of process taking place inside the regulator?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

By the way Krajina is part of Croatia.
 
No.Krajina is in our heart, my friend.
But, this is neither the time nor the place for that discussion.
 
The formula “that circulates within the company” is the definition of the Joule Thomson coefficient ?JT

to- ti= 0.4(pi- pr)+ (tr- ti)

(to – tr)/(pi – pr) = 0.4 = ?JT


I would also check the Joule Thomson coefficient for methane here


Please note the transformation that takes place through a reducing valve is not properly isenthalpic, which by definition implies that enthalpy remains constant during the whole process. It is more correct to define this process as a quasi-stationary process whose final enthalpy is equal to the initial enthalpy.
 
Jezovuk,

How did you get -108.255 °C with the data you have reported in your OP?

T2 = T1* (P2/P1)^[(k-1)/k]

With k = 1.31 (be aware this value stands for methane at 1 barg and 25 °C ---> not your conditions)

T2 = 132.733 K = -140.417 °C

Moreover the problem is that what above stands for a reversible adiabatic transformation and for an ideal gas (which I doubt your case is).
 
ione,

thank You for your time.
It was my mistake, Your result is correct.
I am aware of that, but I could not find adiabatic exponent of natural gas (k)for my condisions so I assumed that it is a ideal gas (k=cp/cv) and that it's change of state is adiabatic in order to get some starting, approximate data.
I realise now that is not the case and that result is completly wrong.

In Your previous message You said that (to – tr)/(pi – pr) = 0.4 = ?JT is a definition of Joule Thomson coefficient, but where is a reference to specific gas in that equation?
In my case: (to – tr)/(pi – pr)= 0.305 °C/bar.
 
My hint was to check the value of the Joule-Thomson coefficient for methane at your reference conditions (pressure and temperature before expansion) using the NIST link. I am not sure the value you’ve reported (0.4 °C/bar) is correct.

Then the following formula

(deltaT/deltaP) at constant enthalpy = ?JT

(to-tr)/(pi-pr)= ?JT

allows you to compute the temperature tr of the expanded gas.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor