I think that the caveat "RARELY" applies; there's a reason why all the engineering disciplines aren't flooded with super-engineers. The sub bullet "Be really good at something" has to come into play; I think most people simply are NOT "really good at something." We can see that in children's sports; all those kids playing summer league, travelling league, etc., to the point where they might actually be good enough to get noticed for a college scholarship, and find that there are dozens of people equally good, or even better. And by the end of college, most of them wind up having to live in the real world, instead of going to the "big show." And in some cases, it may simply be the lack of decent educational resources/opportunities, or it may simply be that most people are NOT "really good" at anything, they may be just barely good enough to hold any job.
Sure, there might be a potential Edison, slaving away at some menial job, but the odds are pretty low, but non-zero, for that happening. That first sub bullet is a really large threshold, and that puts the 90- or 99 percent of the rest of the discipline in those lower-paid jobs. There's obviously a question whether any of the lower quartiles would, or could, be successful in something else. And, that would need to be coupled with the 3rd sub bullet, "really enjoy something" and the two somethings have to coincide. Otherwise, one is faced with choosing something that they're really good at vs. something they really enjoy. And, only then might there be the commensurate compensation. On top of all of that, you need to be able to manage your finances well enough, and have a number of other dominoes fall your way, like health, companies that have some level of staying power, etc.
TTFN (ta ta for now)
I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert!
faq731-376 forum1529 Entire Forum list