nick269
Geotechnical
- Feb 9, 2006
- 14
I am working in Vietnam in a project that includes the design of bridges, roads, and canal embankment modifications, so both shallow and deep foundations are involved. The ground is characterized by soft organic clays and high water level elevations.
The problem I am having is with the drilling contractor who insists taking what are supposed to be undisturbed samples by driving in a thin-walled Shelby tube with a 50 kg hammer. These samples are supposed to be for direct shear box and oedometer consolidation testing. According to Vietnamese standards, in soft clays the sampler should be pushed by the hydraulic system of the rig, but it is allowed to take samples driven by percussive methods in stiff clays. Could this be true?
In my view, the lab test values derived from these samples which are banged into the soil are invalid, and are not worth the money spent. It would be more cost effective to use SPT values and collect disturbed samples, for classification, and Atterburg limits etc.
The rational, as explained by the contractor, is that the trimmed sample has a diameter much less than the sample in the tube, and so disturbance is minimal. I don't buy that.
Am I just being a hard-assed engineer, or is my view supported by most other standards. I know that ASTM requires hydraulically pushed samples.
Nick