I am a registered professional engineer in a handful of states. Recently our office came across some articles that reference ethical issues surrounding the use of P.E. after the engineer's name. The idea is that the use of these initials can be misconstrued as registration in a state that an engineer is not licensed in.
For example, John Doe P.E., registered only in Maryland, gives his business card to a potential client in West Virginia. Clearly, soliciting work by falsely claiming that you are registered in WV is unethical; however, what if John Doe's business card has a MD address and John's office has engineers who are registered in WV.
Additionally, is it unethical to use P.E. on correspondence (letters, emails, etc.) for a project in a state in which the engineer is not registered? This would apply in the common case of a project manager who does the bulk of the design and contract administration work on a project but does not stamp the contract documents. Most of the correspondence will be written and signed by the project manager and will likely not require a seal and signature. This leads to a situation where the project manager will be placing their name and P.E. on correspondence in relation to a project in a state in which they are not registered. The PM at that point is not claiming to be registered in the state, but is a licensed professional in the state in which their design office is located and in the state shown on the letter head (or email).
We have read articles that suggest listing states of licensure after the name of the engineer as a way to clearly define licensure and avoid a misunderstanding. However, providing a list of states can also be detrimental to an engineering firm. The firm's clients may see states that are not listed and no longer feel comfortable using a particular engineer at that firm. However, not all engineers at one firm need to be registered in all states where they practice engineering. Not to mention, for some engineers a list of states would not fit on a business card.
I would appreciate any feedback on this issue.
Additional reading on this attached.
For example, John Doe P.E., registered only in Maryland, gives his business card to a potential client in West Virginia. Clearly, soliciting work by falsely claiming that you are registered in WV is unethical; however, what if John Doe's business card has a MD address and John's office has engineers who are registered in WV.
Additionally, is it unethical to use P.E. on correspondence (letters, emails, etc.) for a project in a state in which the engineer is not registered? This would apply in the common case of a project manager who does the bulk of the design and contract administration work on a project but does not stamp the contract documents. Most of the correspondence will be written and signed by the project manager and will likely not require a seal and signature. This leads to a situation where the project manager will be placing their name and P.E. on correspondence in relation to a project in a state in which they are not registered. The PM at that point is not claiming to be registered in the state, but is a licensed professional in the state in which their design office is located and in the state shown on the letter head (or email).
We have read articles that suggest listing states of licensure after the name of the engineer as a way to clearly define licensure and avoid a misunderstanding. However, providing a list of states can also be detrimental to an engineering firm. The firm's clients may see states that are not listed and no longer feel comfortable using a particular engineer at that firm. However, not all engineers at one firm need to be registered in all states where they practice engineering. Not to mention, for some engineers a list of states would not fit on a business card.
I would appreciate any feedback on this issue.
Additional reading on this attached.