Platonicus
Petroleum
- Oct 7, 2021
- 8
Hello!
I design a vapor recovery unit for a gasoline tank farm and a railroad loading and unloading ramp. The customer decided to use a vapor recovery unit (also for environmental reasons). In order to reduce costs, it was decided to use an absorption type VRU, which is an absorption column with a liquid tank and 2 pumps for lean and rich absorbent. Diesel fuel is used as an absorbent.
In many analogue projects developed by manufacturers of complete supplies of VRUs, the absorber has a low support (about 0.5-1.0 m or 1.64-3.28 ft). For this reason, the question arises as to how the pumping of the rich absorbent from the column is ensured without cavitation. Because the liquid absorbs hydrocarbon vapors, then, accordingly, it is in a state of saturation. Considering that conventional centrifugal pumps have a NPSH in the region of 2-3 m or 6.56-9.84 ft, it is suspected that there may be cavitation.
Therefore, I ask for help with understanding this aspect. Why don't suppliers make a higher support for the absorption tower? Did I correctly decide that the liquid is in a state of saturation and the NPSH, therefore, depends only on the geometric height of the liquid minus hydraulic losses? Or do they use some kind of special pumps that can work with a very low NPSH of the system?
I design a vapor recovery unit for a gasoline tank farm and a railroad loading and unloading ramp. The customer decided to use a vapor recovery unit (also for environmental reasons). In order to reduce costs, it was decided to use an absorption type VRU, which is an absorption column with a liquid tank and 2 pumps for lean and rich absorbent. Diesel fuel is used as an absorbent.
In many analogue projects developed by manufacturers of complete supplies of VRUs, the absorber has a low support (about 0.5-1.0 m or 1.64-3.28 ft). For this reason, the question arises as to how the pumping of the rich absorbent from the column is ensured without cavitation. Because the liquid absorbs hydrocarbon vapors, then, accordingly, it is in a state of saturation. Considering that conventional centrifugal pumps have a NPSH in the region of 2-3 m or 6.56-9.84 ft, it is suspected that there may be cavitation.
Therefore, I ask for help with understanding this aspect. Why don't suppliers make a higher support for the absorption tower? Did I correctly decide that the liquid is in a state of saturation and the NPSH, therefore, depends only on the geometric height of the liquid minus hydraulic losses? Or do they use some kind of special pumps that can work with a very low NPSH of the system?