Back from a few days off . . .
Bill stated:
When I was involved in this some years ago, we often replaced the older type of insulation (class B) with more modern Class F (epoxy etc) insulation. This can be thinner and we made the space up with copper, so we used much the same winding but with larger copper.
It's been a few years [ 23, actually ], but IIRC when all sixteen ~60 MVA hydraulic generators in the plant I worked in were sequentially rewound as part of a complete plant rehabilitation and unit rebuild, this is very close to if not exactly what happened; brand new windings using the same flat copper conductor configuration but with a larger cross section and with new and improved insulation were installed.
I'd take time now and then during plant inspections to have a look-see at how the rewinds were progressing, and I recall observing the way that once the winding halves were installed and wedged in, the exacting and painstaking work of the installers began. They would patiently tin and solder together the corresponding ends of each winding conductor, apply the insulation, then move to the next pole and do the same thing. By this means the applied epoxy insulation had sufficient time to cure, ensuring that by the time the installer had completed one circuit of the stator, that that joint would not sustain damage when the next set of conductors were tinned and soldered.
I had to admire their patience; I think I would likely have found this to be simply mind-numbing work . . .
Incidentally, the re-built units, not only having re-wound generators but completely redesigned hydraulic turbines, were rated at 65 MW and, again IIRC, at ~75 MVA. This proved to be of great benefit, since more water could be passed during spring freshet conditions without the need to enter spill conditions so as to satisfy the prevailing flow schedule.
CR
"As iron sharpens iron, so one person sharpens another." [Proverbs 27:17, NIV]