WiSEiwish
Structural
- Mar 28, 2013
- 123
Hello,
I am trying to design a column bracket that is going to support a runway beam for a bridge crane. The beam is a WF beam with a cap channel. The bracket will be either a WT or a built up T section. My question doesn't really involve designing the bracket per se, but rather the interaction between the bracket and the runway girder.
The runway girder will be running perpendicular to the bracket stiffener which means that the bearing length of the reaction on the girder is going to be equal to the thickness of the stiffener rather than the length of a stiffener as a normal seated connection would be. This could require the girder to need stiffeners.
My question is that if it is the case the the runway girder requires stiffeners at the bracket, could I have plates welded perpendicular to the bracket stiffener to provide a longer bearing length and thus eliminate the need for stiffeners? If that is an option, would it have any real affect on the design of the bracket?
Thanks.
I am trying to design a column bracket that is going to support a runway beam for a bridge crane. The beam is a WF beam with a cap channel. The bracket will be either a WT or a built up T section. My question doesn't really involve designing the bracket per se, but rather the interaction between the bracket and the runway girder.
The runway girder will be running perpendicular to the bracket stiffener which means that the bearing length of the reaction on the girder is going to be equal to the thickness of the stiffener rather than the length of a stiffener as a normal seated connection would be. This could require the girder to need stiffeners.
My question is that if it is the case the the runway girder requires stiffeners at the bracket, could I have plates welded perpendicular to the bracket stiffener to provide a longer bearing length and thus eliminate the need for stiffeners? If that is an option, would it have any real affect on the design of the bracket?
Thanks.