PGODAVARTI
Aerospace
- Jun 22, 2004
- 1
dear friends:
need your help. we ran some tensile tests (fasterner held between two grips on an instron) and pulled it to failure. we reviewed the resultant data (stress calculated as instanaeous load/orggonal reduced thread area) and strain (cross head displacement divided by displcament of the cross head). we then calcuated the 0.2% yield strength. this number (yield?) is approxomately 2X greater than the 35-40 ksi published in the fastener specification. however the ultimate load is only 10% higher than the published ultimate.
Design folks want to know what gives: we may have preloaded the bolts to beyond yield if the spec data is to be believed.
Hint: the threads on the bolts during the test were not lubrictaed. Is it our test method, or is it something more fundamental in nature. we have some theories but we need your help. What am I missing
need your help. we ran some tensile tests (fasterner held between two grips on an instron) and pulled it to failure. we reviewed the resultant data (stress calculated as instanaeous load/orggonal reduced thread area) and strain (cross head displacement divided by displcament of the cross head). we then calcuated the 0.2% yield strength. this number (yield?) is approxomately 2X greater than the 35-40 ksi published in the fastener specification. however the ultimate load is only 10% higher than the published ultimate.
Design folks want to know what gives: we may have preloaded the bolts to beyond yield if the spec data is to be believed.
Hint: the threads on the bolts during the test were not lubrictaed. Is it our test method, or is it something more fundamental in nature. we have some theories but we need your help. What am I missing