Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Helicopter crash Hudson River

LittleInch

Petroleum
Mar 27, 2013
22,468
Helicopter sight seeing inner York crashed with all dead.

This video looks like it was flying at some speed, then something happens, it seems to change orientation very rapidly which causes the whole tail structure to detach, followed shortly by the main rotor blade and part of the gearbox. Horrible way to go.


 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

What a tragedy.

I'm not very knowledgeable about helicopters, but It seems the Bell 206 has had some reliability issues with the freewheel unit (specifically due to lubrication issues, see the links below). To my understanding, if the freewheel unit seizes during a gearbox failure, the forces could be great enough to shear off the rotor. Unsure if this would be enough to also separate the tail from the fuselage as in the video. Another failure mode is described in the second link, where the freewheel unit suddenly engaged with engine RPMs significantly exceeding rotor RPMs, shearing the rotor mast.

Perhaps someone more knowledgeable could shed some light on whether these scenarios are applicable to the situation in question.

1. https://www.casa.gov.au/sites/defau...lures-mast-yielding-main-rotor-separation.pdf
2. https://www.pprune.org/archive/index.php/t-561337.html
 
I don't think it is. Those are related to the snapping or breaking of the main rotor shaft. It seems the main rotor came off way after the initial incident with the tail rotor or tail assembly.

It seems that the helicopter was horsing along at about 100 knots and something seems to have happened which has thrown the chopper sideways violently and caused the tail to either hit the main rotor blades or simply snap off. Then its in a death spiral and the main rotors come off about half way down.

What that something is is not clear and could be either a snap change of the tail rotor from one angle to the other or a gearbox failure or tail rotor seizure.
 
The images of the family photos just prior to this incident are heartbreaking. They are excited about a sightseeing trip not knowing their lives are going to end in a few short minutes.

Always good to remember you aren't guaranteed tomorrow.
 
is a zoomed in version https://streamable.com/56ttmc

Looks like something very dramatic happened which caused the helicopter to yaw and spin violently to the right which caused the break up of the tail.

The money seeks to be on main gearbox failure and hence may have weakened the gearbox which then broke off along with the main rotors.

So possibly if the main gearbox jammed and the motor flung the helicopter round before it probably broke something. Once the tail went there was no getting it back.
 
It appears the aircraft experienced directional stability issues which caused the tail assembly to separate and subsequently the rotor assembly. Note the original video is not continuous.

Crash 10.2.GIF
 
Last edited:
Got 20 minutes? Here is a video on mast bumping.


Some helicopter can strike the tail boom with the rotor under some conditions. Robinson is notorious for this.
 
The tail assembly appears to become unstable as the aircraft starts yawing (or what appears to be yawing). Given the unknown compression parameters applied to the original video, it's difficult to assess what may be algorithm induced artifacts.

Edit: The aircraft might have already rolled 90deg as it enters the view of the camera.

CRASH 9.960.GIF
 
Last edited:
Honestly if you don't need to go in a helicopter. Don't go in one out of choice.

They are great when you need them but the additional risk is way above most other forms of transport.

The pilot it seems was ex military and was reported by his peers as more than competent. Not that really precludes a human factor mistake.
 
Helicopters are thousands of parts temporarily flying in close formation. My favorite explanation is that they work because they're so ugly the ground doesn't want to touch them, but when the parts also don't want to be something ugly, so when the parts go their separate ways that ground stops repelling them since they're no longer a helicopter.

In reality, they're just less robust than other aircraft. There's far less redundancy & far more single points of failure than in a fixed-wing aircraft. They're phenomenally useful for quite a few tasks where the improved capabilities outweigh the increased risk (e.g. medical or rescue helicopters save far more lives than they take) but sightseeing helicopters are absolutely a risk.
 
The media has jumped on the "Jesus nut" bandwagon despite the the gearbox still being attached to the rotor assembly.
 
They do seem to have a large number of single point failure mechanisms alright.

Also the main rotor , with what looks like part kf the gearbox, didn't detachjust until half way down. It's when you see the whole i cident that you realise so thing happened much earlier and very sudden which has caused the tail to break off and it looked like the helicopter rolled violently as well.
 
They require very little encouragement to self destruct.

They can do it with no failures, just a butterfly fart in the other hemisphere can trigger them to suicide.
 

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor