Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

Search results for query: *

  • Users: ROKAA
  • Order by date
  1. ROKAA

    ASME Section IX WPQ in 2G Rotated Position

    Thank you for the second opinion! I will go ahead with my initial thought then.
  2. ROKAA

    ASME Section IX WPQ in 2G Rotated Position

    Hey Everyone, I was posed the question as to whether or not 2G Rotated could be used during welder performance qualifications and still be ASME Section IX compliant. This would make it easier for welders to pass, however we do non-rotated 2G welds. I am leaning towards the standard fixed 2G...
  3. ROKAA

    Section IX WOPQ, 2G Single Bevel on Pipe

    I would love to, but the machine can only weld 1G rotated butt welded pipe, which won't qualify the welders for this 2G weld. I may need to see if I can go the "special positions" route.
  4. ROKAA

    Section IX WOPQ, 2G Single Bevel on Pipe

    The WPS is set up per section IX and positions for the WPS are a nonessential variable. But when it comes time for welder qualifications position is essential for the welders and weld operators. Table QW-461.9 shows a list of tests and their positions, and then what positions the welders and...
  5. ROKAA

    Section IX WOPQ, 2G Single Bevel on Pipe

    It is a 5/16" single bevel, and a 1/2" cover fillet. Both materials are carbon steel pipe, the ring being A106B and the pipe being similar to A53B. Customers typically ask for B31.3 or B31.1. I know if I qualify welders for semi-auto welding I just need to perform a 2G weld test and that...
  6. ROKAA

    Section IX WOPQ, 2G Single Bevel on Pipe

    Hi, I have a situation where a ring is being welded to the OD of a pipe. The ring has an ID single bevel machined into it. The weld is meant to be a single bevel groove filled and then a fillet cover weld. We weld (machine weld) it while the pipe is 1G rotated with the weld gun at the 12...
Back
Top