drwebb
Automotive
- Oct 23, 2002
- 402
NTSB Abstract of final report issued: Link
Some interesting conclusions. Despite contemporaneous popular press reporting, the lost window behind the wing was NOT impacted by the fan blade but by debris from the separated engine cowling, as posters on this forum hypothesized at the time.
Often these exhaustive reports turn up interesting little details available only in the original sources. The report commends the crew, and gives the flight crew a pass on not fully completing all their checklists while managing the emergency. Also, apparently the two other passengers on the left side of row 14 were relocated, with one occupying a flight attendant's 'jump seat' in the galley, presumably leaving one attendant unrestrained. NTSB recommended an OFI from this practice as the flight attendants have responsibility (i.e. more indispensable) in evacuation during an emergency landing.
Some interesting conclusions. Despite contemporaneous popular press reporting, the lost window behind the wing was NOT impacted by the fan blade but by debris from the separated engine cowling, as posters on this forum hypothesized at the time.
Often these exhaustive reports turn up interesting little details available only in the original sources. The report commends the crew, and gives the flight crew a pass on not fully completing all their checklists while managing the emergency. Also, apparently the two other passengers on the left side of row 14 were relocated, with one occupying a flight attendant's 'jump seat' in the galley, presumably leaving one attendant unrestrained. NTSB recommended an OFI from this practice as the flight attendants have responsibility (i.e. more indispensable) in evacuation during an emergency landing.