Althalus
Structural
- Jan 21, 2003
- 152
In seismic design, we use Tables 11.6-1 and 11.6-2 to categorize SDC. But I just noticed a quirk I hadn't noticed before. And it generated a question.
Sds = 0.32 (SDC B)
Sd1 = 0.20 (SDC C)
Normally, I'd just pick the higher classification and go with that. But I just noticed that when Calculating Cs, the equation that controls is 12.8-2 which is determined by Sds, not Sd1 (which determines Cs in eq 12.8-2&3).
If the controlling load is based on Sds, it would seem reasonable to consider this to still be in SDC B rather than C.
We still have the statement:
But the remainder of the sentence is interesting.
When the Sds is low enough that T doesn't even enter into the consideration, then it is already irrespective of T. It is just flat out in SDC B. Note that Eq 12.8-2 does not include T.
What say you?
Sds = 0.32 (SDC B)
Sd1 = 0.20 (SDC C)
Normally, I'd just pick the higher classification and go with that. But I just noticed that when Calculating Cs, the equation that controls is 12.8-2 which is determined by Sds, not Sd1 (which determines Cs in eq 12.8-2&3).
If the controlling load is based on Sds, it would seem reasonable to consider this to still be in SDC B rather than C.
We still have the statement:
ASCE 7 said:Each building and structure shall be assigned to the more severe (SDC) in accorance with Table 11.6-1 or 11.6-2
But the remainder of the sentence is interesting.
ASCE 7 said:"Irrespective of the fundamental period of vibration of the structure, T."
When the Sds is low enough that T doesn't even enter into the consideration, then it is already irrespective of T. It is just flat out in SDC B. Note that Eq 12.8-2 does not include T.
What say you?