Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Attic Truss - Floor Sheathing Flat Diaphragm

StrEng007

Structural
Aug 22, 2014
506
Hello, everyone. Seems like all my posts have been about diaphragm action lately. Here's another one I'm working through on a current job.

I have attic trusses with "floor" sheathing and would like to make use of that sheathing as I diaphragm. One of my concerns is that I know there will be a vertical web member that will interrupt the wood structural panels. One option is to notch around these vertical webs but is see that being problematic in the field (i.e. nice on paper but seems like it would cause the GC a headache).

Now, I realize that I could sheath the top and bottom of the truss chord (1 for floor sheathing and 1 as a ceiling diaphragm). This would be my last resort with this sort of option since I don't want to double the cost of the sheathing.

Screenshot_2024-10-16_092045_zrcfp8.png


Moving forward, my concerns/questions are as following:

1. Without a ceiling diaphragm, do I need to be concerned about the mechanism by which lateral wind load will go from the top plate into the floor diaphragm? My thinking is there is some local transfer of axial force through the bottom chord that gets picked up by the diaphragm.

2. Is it necessary to have the sub diaphragm at each end as shown in the image below? Or would the truss bottom chord (behaving like a strut) be good enough to get the load into the "Main Diaphragm"? Obviously, it'll still be sheathed due to function of the attic, but I'd just ignore it's contribution. On the other hand, the truss manufacturer might require some additional webs at each end to make it work.

Sheathing and Blocking for discontinuous panels:
Screenshot_2024-10-16_093234_y14qcp.png


Additional Truss webs where Sub1/Sub2 no longer seems like an option:
Screenshot_2024-10-16_093253_znxnsg.png
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Footnote a - you can't mix them with a plywood diaphragm in calculations for design. (I suspect the intent here is on the "same" level, i.e. plywood roof diaphragm and ceiling diaphragm.

I'm going to quibble with you calling full height or continuous studs "balloon framing" in a gable. That's not what that term means. It means the studs extend past the floor and are continuous from foundation to second floor top plates. Hypothetically in the "triple deckers" they extended to the third floor top plates.

 
lex - if there's a ceiling, it is balloon framing. I'm designing one like that at the beach right now. Short gable, so the max stud height is only about 13'. Makes more sense to balloon frame it with a ledger and fire blocking at the ceiling height than breaking it and doing some sort of bracing for the hinge.
 
Around here, it is common to call any framing that bypasses the ceiling framing or is in a vaulted gable/stairwell balloon framing. I know traditionally it meant what Lex has stated.
 

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor