gkennedy34
Chemical
- Jan 11, 2007
- 16
I've modeled heat of solution effects in Aspen Plus for diluting 50% caustic to 10% in an attempt to determine resultant temperatures at varying concentrations. This temperature is being compared against a piping specification to ensure the piping is adequate for this service. The resultant temperature curve for diluting the 50% caustic ventures into the area of the piping specification "service graph" where it requires stress relieving welds and bends. The maximum temperature is around 30% dilution (by weight), but the final temperature at 10% is well below the stress relief requirement zone.
In my mind, as long as the full amount of dilution water is delivered at the mixing point, the bulk temperature of the liquid should remain below the "stress relief" zone. In other words, the enthalpy of the combined streams is instantaneous and the heat of solution effects will raise the temperature to its final resultant temperature.
Is my thinking flawed?
Thanks.
gk
Side note: I compared Aspen Plus' results with a empirical reference curve and found very good agreement with dilution from 30% to 10%. Aspen Plus' resultant temperatures from 50% to 30% were significantly higher. Since Aspen's numbers were on the conservative side, I think I am okay (as long as my thinking above is not flawed). Once I got "okay" agreement with the reference curve I changed my dilution water and 50% caustic stream temperatures to model the system I was interested in.
In my mind, as long as the full amount of dilution water is delivered at the mixing point, the bulk temperature of the liquid should remain below the "stress relief" zone. In other words, the enthalpy of the combined streams is instantaneous and the heat of solution effects will raise the temperature to its final resultant temperature.
Is my thinking flawed?
Thanks.
gk
Side note: I compared Aspen Plus' results with a empirical reference curve and found very good agreement with dilution from 30% to 10%. Aspen Plus' resultant temperatures from 50% to 30% were significantly higher. Since Aspen's numbers were on the conservative side, I think I am okay (as long as my thinking above is not flawed). Once I got "okay" agreement with the reference curve I changed my dilution water and 50% caustic stream temperatures to model the system I was interested in.