ChexMix
Military
- Aug 20, 2011
- 4
Hello,
I'm attempting to come up with the best method to achieve maximum condensation (air dryness).
In the system an exhaust fan will draw in steam (212F) and pass it through a 90 degree pipe (~12-14 inches) before it enters an area where it needs to be cooled for the purpose of removing the maximum amount of humidity.
The steam produced in an hour equals:
337.7 cubic feet
14,495 BTU,
4.24 KWh
The purpose of condensing the vapor back into liquid is to protect the down-stream activated charcoal filter from degradation due to high humidity.
The questions I'm having difficulty answering are as follows:
1) How to match the cooling/dehumidifying efficiency of a system with the optimum amount of air flow (ie choosing the right fan for the right amount of airflow for the system to be the most efficient)
Example: If I am passing 500 cubit feet of air through the system per hour and I want to achieve a certain % humidity where do I go from here?
I've attached the concept drawing
Thanks in advance for your replies
I'm attempting to come up with the best method to achieve maximum condensation (air dryness).
In the system an exhaust fan will draw in steam (212F) and pass it through a 90 degree pipe (~12-14 inches) before it enters an area where it needs to be cooled for the purpose of removing the maximum amount of humidity.
The steam produced in an hour equals:
337.7 cubic feet
14,495 BTU,
4.24 KWh
The purpose of condensing the vapor back into liquid is to protect the down-stream activated charcoal filter from degradation due to high humidity.
The questions I'm having difficulty answering are as follows:
1) How to match the cooling/dehumidifying efficiency of a system with the optimum amount of air flow (ie choosing the right fan for the right amount of airflow for the system to be the most efficient)
Example: If I am passing 500 cubit feet of air through the system per hour and I want to achieve a certain % humidity where do I go from here?
I've attached the concept drawing
Thanks in advance for your replies