dthom0425
Mechanical
- Dec 6, 2018
- 46
Hi all,
Attached is a very simplified model of a curved part I have. The curved part mounts on a cylindrical surface, no separate alignment features other than the clearance holes in the part.
I'm curious as to your thoughts on the best way to apply datums to this part. Functionally, I care that the holes are oriented to the central axis of the curvature.
I was going to make my primary datum the bottom curved face, and the pattern of holes datum feature B thus locking this part in all DOF. From there, the remainder of the feature (which a bunch are not shown) would be back to A|B(M).
Does this sound like an acceptable method? I assume the curved surface as a datum feature may cause some heartburn if you were trying to hard gauge it but a CMM may be able to do this?
Thanks for you insight.
Attached is a very simplified model of a curved part I have. The curved part mounts on a cylindrical surface, no separate alignment features other than the clearance holes in the part.
I'm curious as to your thoughts on the best way to apply datums to this part. Functionally, I care that the holes are oriented to the central axis of the curvature.
I was going to make my primary datum the bottom curved face, and the pattern of holes datum feature B thus locking this part in all DOF. From there, the remainder of the feature (which a bunch are not shown) would be back to A|B(M).
Does this sound like an acceptable method? I assume the curved surface as a datum feature may cause some heartburn if you were trying to hard gauge it but a CMM may be able to do this?
Thanks for you insight.