Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Fixture build and Datum scheme- inquiry

Status
Not open for further replies.

Manpreet Singh

Automotive
May 8, 2024
5
I am attaching a simplified part drawing that I have to make a checking fixture of. Following are my queries:

1. I was thinking of holding the A datums using 4-way locator pins (conical), so both holes are concentric but then I realized if I do that, how would the part touch the B-datum, what are your thoughts on it?
2. The C datum has positional tolerance to it. What would be the pin size to locate C-datum?
 
 https://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=2348843e-7471-4243-a2e6-b5c5ff9f94be&file=Datum_structure.jpg
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Use pins for Datum A. You can make them coaxial.
Datum B would be the face of what makes datum A.

Datum C simulator diameter will be Hole MMC minus Pos. tol.
 
So, should we just use Ø4mm pin for A-datums?
Also, does that mean we should use (5.07-.20)= 4.87 pin for C-datums?
 
For physical gauging, yes because that's what is written on the sketch.
Or use a CMM [atom]
 
Datum_structure_guipgj.jpg
 
Sorry, since I am new to this. One of my co-workers statement is that C-datum should be constrained with its True Geometric counterpart i.e. Ø5.07 mm pin. What do you think of this statement

 
OP said:
One of my co-workers statement is that C-datum should be constrained with its True Geometric counterpart i.e. Ø5.07 mm pin. What do you think of this statement

I would use Ø5.07 - 0.2
 
The drawing doesn't show the feature control frame that references the 3 datum features, so any suggestions on the size of datum feature simuoator pins are only guesses. Ø5.07 - 0.2 assumes C was referenced at MMB.
 
Lets say if there is another hole below C Datum hole, referencing the datum features as attached. Then what would be the pin size of C datum.
Untitled_jz4bs8.jpg
 
Manpreet Singh said:
1. I was thinking of holding the A datums using 4-way locator pins (conical), so both holes are concentric but then I realized if I do that, how would the part touch the B-datum, what are your thoughts on it?

Your holes are concentric by definition.

I agree that you cannot use cones. Your feature-of-size datums are not very accurate. Are your references to Datum[ ]A Regardless of Feature Size (RFS)?

Manpreet Singh said:
2. The C datum has positional tolerance to it. What would be the pin size to locate C-datum?

Look up diamond pins. Your datum[ ]C feature controls rotation only. Your pin needs only to contact the sides of the hole. Otherwise, your Ø0.2 positional tolerace is more than made up for by the +0.5/0 tolerances of your datum[ ]A features.

--
JHG
 
You said:
Lets say if there is another hole below C Datum hole, referencing the datum features as attached. Then what would be the pin size of C datum.

Still D5.07-0.2 because Datum C is referenced to A|B thus making it MMC minus position.
Also for Datum D, C is RFS, no datum shift allowed.
 
OP said:
Lets say if there is another hole below C Datum hole, referencing the datum features as attached. Then what would be the pin size of C datum.

Since C is referenced at RMB,
the datum feature simulator for C would be the largest pin that fits in the actual datum feature C hole, while kept at fixed distance from simulated datum axis A and perpendicular to simulated datum plane B. An expanding pin is typically used for that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor