Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

HOLE PATTERN POSITION CONTROL- FCF SUGGESTIONS

Status
Not open for further replies.

Vimalmechs

Mechanical
Mar 18, 2013
48
Hi all,

Please have a look on the PFA.
My Functional requirement is, I want to control the movement of hole pattern.” Pattern should be parallel to DATUM A or B or together, holes should shift together and hole pattern can move within .04 dia zone.

1) All the holes should be within .04 dia zone .
2) Hole pattern should move together. pattern rotation is not allowed more than .010 zone. Movement should be parallel to A DATUM or parallel to B DATUM or BOTH.

I have implemented FCF based on my requirement. Any one please highlight that any alternate options are available to achieve the same?

Vimal VV
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

What you've shown does achieve the requirements stated. However, in most practical applications, it would be advisable to include the front or back face of the plate as a datum, and make in the primary datum.

Also, which GD&T standard are you using? (ISO or ASME)

John-Paul Belanger
Certified Sr. GD&T Professional
Geometric Learning Systems
 
My part is a sheet metal.Thickness is not a concern for me.Thats why i have avoided.
I am using ASME.

Vimal VV
 
No, you need to include the face of the part as a primary datum. And actually, a thin part such as sheet metal needs such a datum even more! This is because it would be difficult to establish the primary plane from such a thin edge as your current datum A. Think about the stability, or wavering of the plate in and out of the picture as drawn now.

So re-write datum feature A as the back face, datum feature B as the bottom edge, and datum feature C as the left edge. Then the only changes to the composite feature control frame would be to add datum C to the upper portion, and add datum B to the lower portion.

If you have a copy of the ASME standard, the datum references would look much like the callout in Figure 7-39 of the 2009 edition, or Figure 5-20(e) of the 1994 standard.

You might also consider an MMC modifier after the tolerance values, but this depends on the function of the holes.

John-Paul Belanger
Certified Sr. GD&T Professional
Geometric Learning Systems
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor