nveneno
New member
- Oct 17, 2006
- 10
In my company’s PA-28 Piper aircrafts, we are experiencing serious problems with the engine starters, for the Lycoming O-540 engines.
The problem is after a few hours (about 50 hrs.) wear on the Bendix gear becomes unacceptable. The same problem has happened on three different aircraft at least 5 times on the last year. It seams the Bendix gear do not retracts properly after the engine run.
We are using the starter P/N MZ-4222 from “Kelly Aerospace Power Systems” Inc. (Prestolite).
The Service Instruction Lycoming Nº 1154, establish as an alternative the engine starter P/N 149 NL produced by Sky-Tec. This starter is defined as a light weight – high torque, using an electric solenoid instead the mechanical Bendix. Sky-Tec uses as brand slogan “no Bendix – no headache”. The price is quite similar and that’s why we are thinking to move to this kind of starters.
Does anyone have experienced the same kind of problem with the Bendix type starters?
Does anyone have references about the Sky-Tech starters?
Nicolas Valencia
The problem is after a few hours (about 50 hrs.) wear on the Bendix gear becomes unacceptable. The same problem has happened on three different aircraft at least 5 times on the last year. It seams the Bendix gear do not retracts properly after the engine run.
We are using the starter P/N MZ-4222 from “Kelly Aerospace Power Systems” Inc. (Prestolite).
The Service Instruction Lycoming Nº 1154, establish as an alternative the engine starter P/N 149 NL produced by Sky-Tec. This starter is defined as a light weight – high torque, using an electric solenoid instead the mechanical Bendix. Sky-Tec uses as brand slogan “no Bendix – no headache”. The price is quite similar and that’s why we are thinking to move to this kind of starters.
Does anyone have experienced the same kind of problem with the Bendix type starters?
Does anyone have references about the Sky-Tech starters?
Nicolas Valencia