Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

"Form should follow function" 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Berkshire, I think that's a case where performance concerns triumph aesthetic concerns by a long margin.

Once aesthetic or similar concerns come seriously into play, even if just in the sub conscious of those designing it, than the form may drift from the function.

Posting guidelines faq731-376 (probably not aimed specifically at you)
What is Engineering anyway: faq1088-1484
 
Kenat,
I think this is a case, where computers driven by Wortman, Eppler, and Ronz have taken the individualism out of the design, and customers will not accept the latest offerings from the manufacturers unless, the performance is at least a fraction of a gnat's anatomy better than the last offering.
Mind you, they do look graceful.
B.E.
 
Greg- a lot of the brutalist academic building in teh UK stem from the large expansion in further education in the uk in the 1960's. A lot of the new universities wanted bold statement architecture, so they hired 'name' architects. And in the 1960's concrete brutalism was the hot fashion in archtecture, so they all got concrete brutalist buildings.. if they buildings had been commissioned in the noughties they would be inside out Foster designs or something.

UEA's ziggurats are famous.....partly for nearly falling down (like the infamous Ronan Point collapse).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top