Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Roof diaphragm ratio for non-structural penthouse

Status
Not open for further replies.

Kin1234

Civil/Environmental
Oct 28, 2020
5
I need to design a roof penthouse for a stair. The penthouse is small with 21 ft long and 3.75 wide. I think this penthouse can be designed as a non-structural component based on the CBC code. Do I still need meet the allowable diaphragm ratio 4:1? If so, what can I do to meet the diaphragm 4:1 ratio besides shorten the length?
Thanks for your help!
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I wouldn't sweat the diaphragm ratio limit for something this small no matter what the code says. Despite appearances, structural engineering is still very much a game dominated by judgment and reasonableness in my opinion. If a cranky code reviewer calls you out on this, I suppose that you could just install a discrete, steel strap bracing system under the roof deck to make it a truss rather than a deck diaphragm. If your walls are concrete or block coming up from below, you might also be able to just make those cantilever.
 
Thanks for quick reply. The plan checker actually calls me out for the diaphragm ratio limit. My building is wood-framed building. I will add a bracing system under the roof deck as you have suggested. Thanks.
 
You're welcome. I guess 4' is pretty darn narrow.

If it's wood, I suppose that you could prefab or site build a flat truss to lay horizontal under or over the framing. It won't be working too hard.
 
Another thought. You're roof deck could easily be constructed with very few plywood sheathing joints (as few as two). If you placed framing members beneath those joints and supplied chords/flanges etc, I feel that you could claim that your roof beam is really a plywood webbed, custom beam rather than a diaphragm as conceived of in the usual sense. I couldn't say if this would fly with your code reviewer or not.
 
I've done KootK's alternate method and provided a horizontal plywood box beam. The AHJ in our area was leery, but ultimately accepted it.
 
Do you actually have an AHJ that checks stuff in Manitoba? If so, I'm jealous. In Alberta, we have no such thing.
 
All right, thanks guys! I think I need to call the plan checker up and present him the box beam idea. If that doesn't work, I will just tell the architect to widening the penthouse.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor