Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations SSS148 on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Species of Preservative Treated Lumber 3

Status
Not open for further replies.

BSVBD

Structural
Jul 23, 2015
463
I sent an inquiry to awc.org, but, I have no idea when they will reply.

What species of wood is used for preservative treated lumber?

I understand that not all, if MANY at all, can receive the preservative treatment.

I've been told many years ago that only SYP can receive preservative treatment. Therefore, that is what I have been specifying for over a decade. I just want to make a follow-up after many years to see fi anything has changed.

Any thoughts?

Thank you!
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Around me (central NC) it is mixed SYP last time I checked.
 
Not sure if there is a limit to what can be treated but I believe SYP, which is what I usually spec for everything, is treated without incising so no strength reduction is required.
 
Southern Pine in my area.

Check out Eng-Tips Forum's Policies here:
faq731-376
 
In Ontario (& I think Canada generally) SPF is the grade group used and permitted for PT wood. That's a structural grading group (Google it if you don't know what that is) that includes species that perform comparably for structure and are virtually indistinguishable once cut into lumber. The primary component of that group in actual commercial production is white spruce, but jack pine, lodgepole pine, and balsam fir are important. The problem is that spruces don't treat well and have low retention rates, whereas pines treat very well. You guys in the states getting SYP are spoiled: great structural qualities and takes treatment like it was invented for it. Here, unless you specify that you want ground contact which requires a higher standard, if you say pressure treated it is really a crap shoot what you will get. It's not really the producer's fault, the problem really originates in the bush: once the log is cut & limbed, it's anonymous for species & they are cutting for species group. That's what they get paid for.
 
I feel your pain oldbldgguy, I've had builders request SPF after I've already designed everything and it sucks. The strength and stiffness is garbage and you really take s hit on the connections with the reduced specific gravity. But from what I hear they come out a lot straighter than SYP boards.
 
OBG:

SRE's posted a link from the Canadian Wood Council that outlines the products that should be used.

Dik
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor