Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations pierreick on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Standard Hooks for Dowels...

Status
Not open for further replies.

ReverenceEng

Structural
Feb 18, 2016
81
Greetings fellow weary travelers!

ACI 3-18 Table 25.3.1 shows the standard hook geometry for development. The next page has Table 25.3.1 shows the standard hook geometry for stirrups, ties, and hoops.

So the question is, what about dowels that are transmitting shear and do not require development?

As an example... through the lens of a typical raised foundation for a 1-3 story residential SFR, most continuous foundations under the stem wall are 15" or 18" wide as shown in the residential code. However, the residential code simply calls out "dowels with standard hooks at the bottom" (paraphrasing). If you use development standard hooks, the geometry doesn't work as the hook extends far into the clear cover. It seems that they must be using minimum standard hooks from 25.3.2, but it doesn't seem to say this (or does it?). Alternatively, is it stated somewhere or simply accepted as practice that hooked dowels that do not need to develop can just have the minimum hook per 25.3.2? Are dowels covered by the statement in 25.3.2 where it says "Minimum inside bend diameters for bars used as transverse reinforcement and standard hooks for bars..." by considering them "transverse reinforcement"?

If so, how does one clarify this on the plans so the contractor knows to use the minimum hooks in these cases...but not...let's say...at the bottom of a retaining wall where you actually do need the development?





 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

ReverenceEng said:
So the question is, what about dowels that are transmitting shear and do not require development?

Technically, if you're using these bars for shear friction, they do have to be developed. That said, I wouldn't get my undies in knot over it in this particular situation. The hooks can be turned in plan such that they do fit. Granted, that's probably not a ton of fun to do in the field.
 
It's going to depend on what you're actually asking those dowels to do. And in most situations, you'd be correct - they don't really do much if you go by ACI 318. If you go by ACI 332 (Residential concrete), they provide a minimum spacing and embedment that doesn't really correspond to anything else. So if you need to transfer shear by shear friction, your 8"x16" footing might not cut it.

But if it's just a plane old house with four walls and a roof - it won't really matter.
 
If a hook extension does not fit within a footing, I just assume they will rotate the hook and point it parallel to the footing (like KootK said).

DaveAtkins
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor