Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Stirrups for one-way shear in two-way slabs

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rsd789

Structural
Aug 30, 2023
14
With the shear capacity change in 318-19 I imagine shear reinforcement has become a lot more common for transfer slabs however I think it's unclear which spacing requirements should be used. Have other engineers been using the two-way slab spacing requirements indicated in Table 8.7.6.3 or beam requirements in table 9.7.6.2.2?

8.7.6 is titled "shear reinforcement - stirrups" and doesn't specify that it's only applicable to two-way shear but the remaining subsection imply that it is. Meanwhile, the one-way slab requirements of 7.7.5 simply refer to the beam requirements which is why I could make the argument for those requirements as well.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

How would stirrups work for a one way shear? are you envisioning a single legged stirrup with 180 degree hooks at some spacing in each direction? Certainly just increasing the slab thickness is more cost effective than tying all that reinforcing.
 
I was initially thinking either multiple-leg stirrup bars or closed stirrups depending on how many legs would be required based on the spacing. If the shear failures occur throughout the slab I would agree but for transfer slabs it's common for only a few locations too be failing, in which case I don't think increasing the total thickness would be cost effective
 
I could envision single leg ties distributed uniformly within high shear zones, then omitted for the remainder of the slab where it’s not required. Similar concept as stud rails.
 
I suggest using “studrail” type shear reinforcing. This reinforcing is much easier and faster to install than loose single leg stirrups.
 
I think stud rails would certainly be easier however it's not listed as a permitted form of one-way shear reinforcement per 22.5.8.5.1. Very unusual as it can be used for two-way shear and I believe other codes allow the use for one-way shear. Might require some "engineering judgement" to justify them working but certainly a possible solution
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor