Search results for query: *

Anyone able to help with this? Anyone is using those MOdel view previews? I have found some topic in google but this is not helping me. thx C.

HI Guys, could please help me understanding what for in model properties in tab Preview we have to separate options: 1) Part Preview 2) Model View Preview In general I understand how works (1) but what for and when I can use (2)? thx C

How to fix such error which enable me to open my assembly? I can try to load assembly with structure only but then it is not possible to load components that are source for link bodies in that top level assembly. thx

I have done this right now and still nx is saying the same that the letter is in use but I dont see such view in a tree.

Hi Guys, as in subject... do you know how to find solution? I have tried many things but none help. thanks

Ok Guys, thanks for your help and suggestions. Toost, yes I am working with PMIs and all new views that are created to show the definition have the specific name. Xwheelguy, I try to push my idea further. Summarizing I dont see any option to make my idea working using standard functionality...

Yeah, I was working like this but it is pretty much time consuming also :). I have moved Replace View Icon to the quick access toolbar... this is better but still... What I would like to have is using popup selection toolbar similar to the filter for objects (point, curve, face, body, etc....)...

This is NX9.0.3.4, for standard view yes it is possible to choose from the ribbon. But how to have a possibility to have in the ribbon custom views? or not in the ribbon but in other places in any bars? thx K.

Hi, Is anybody aware if it is possible to move from the Part Navigator the Model Views and have it somewhere i.e. in quick bar or other location to have it easier to manipulate between changing views and Model History? thanks K.

Kapmnit123 - thx for ppt I did the same, your answer clarified my assumption. Toost- yes, in real hard to find that type of situation ... but if we could move in to the past (travel in time) in real that could be the explanation :):):):) that we want a model in place where it was earlier.

Thanks guys for help. Ufsure - I like your way of positioning the parts, what this step does: Orient WCS to the saved CSYS of the component part? your process works well but is there any option to make it very quick for more components? Or verify if some of them that I select are in that...

Anyone can help with that as above? Is it possible to reset the position of the component to absolute after the part was positioned in special location i.e. by constrains? thx K.

Hi Guys, Lately I am working with assembly AA where I have added my component A in specific axial location i.e. 100in from CSYS and I used fix constrain for that component in assembly AA. After that I realized I need to change the way of modeling and model A reposition in A part itself to 90in...

[highlight #E9B96E]that works thanks[/highlight]

Hi Guys, I was using pattern features of c-bore holes on a link body with blend. first "mother" holes is extending up to cut the blend nicely but the holes from pattern are not doing that... do you know if I may fix that with some options or I need to i.e. do synchronous modeling and delete...

Cowski, great thanks!!! :) it is working perfect. k.

Hi Friends, I am building assembly in NX and I am manually doing callout attributes becauase I want them to be matching with the intent from Engineer but when I switch to cad drawing file (where I create drawing) I have those attributes different then in assembly. Do you Guys know why? And how...

You may try export selected objects to new part. File-EXPORT->PRT

Guys, I have suppressed some operations that were making consistency error and the view has updated :) ... I need to figure out how to model similar geometry just with no cosistensy issue :)

You guys say that inteference is making troubles. What if I want to show interference in the section view? What to do if I have a bolt and threaded hole where interference is not possible to omitt because it is always showing engagement? Is it really intereference issue?