Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations SSS148 on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

deficiencies in Y14.38 - Abbreviations

Status
Not open for further replies.

KENAT

Mechanical
Jun 12, 2006
18,387
Anyone else get annoyed by some of the obvious words and abbreviations omitted in Y14.38. Especially those that were in Y14.1 before it was replaced.

For example Container isn't in 14.38. In Y14.1 it was apparantly CNTNR.

 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Make that Y1.1 not 14.1.
 
Haven't noticed. My employer's too cheap to provide either Y1.1 or Y14.38. Instead I use MIL-STD-12 which is dowloadable free from the Internet.


Tunalover
 
Mil-Std-12 is pretty out of date, but I guess better than nothing. What ASME Y14.38 has done is remove all the slashes and dashes from abbreviations and acronyms, as well as delete several of my favorite and most useful abbreviations. WHY??? That is why, as long as I'm doing commercial and not military anyway, I still use the good ones that are in ASME Y1.1.
 
Ultimately, I've seen companies develop a colloquial system of abbreviations which are meaningful internally, regardless to what standards exist.

Matt
CAD Engineer/ECN Analyst
Silicon Valley, CA
 
Then there are acronyns, of which many industries (especially mine, the semiconductor and metrology industry) are full of.
Abbreviations, if not in an industry standard or a disseminated company standard, should be initially defined on the drawing or document, then used after that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor